Similar skill to creating effective searches on Google/ddg,another thing I learnt from that article is that people are actually charging $1.99 to create a prompt for those too lazy to come up with their own
I have seen discussion elsewhere that in the future "prompt engineer" could become a viable profession, which must really piss off those guys who can actually build bridges and shit - it was bad enough when computer programmers started referring to themselves as "software engineers", but now the artistic types are in on the act...
It's ironic that the logo-free Forest kit is actually the most corporate of them all, cos they're holding out for an undeservedly remunerative deal.you could’ve added he’s now at N Forest, playing better than ever, unlike at that corporate behemoth Utd
Of course, with open access and the ability to run the model on a widely available GPU, the opportunity for abuse increases dramatically.
“A percentage of people are simply unpleasant and weird, but that’s humanity,” Mostaque said. “Indeed, it is our belief this technology will be prevalent, and the paternalistic and somewhat condescending attitude of many AI aficionados is misguided in not trusting society.”
Mostaque stresses, however, that free availability allows the community to develop countermeasures.
“We are taking significant safety measures including formulating cutting-edge tools to help mitigate potential harms across release and our own services. With hundreds of thousands developing on this model, we are confident the net benefit will be immensely positive and as billions use this tech harms will be negated.”
About time we just banned images outright
Chad manifestoor just the percentage of people who are simply unpleasant and weird.
There are things that should remain unseen. Terrible things.
View attachment 12578View attachment 12579View attachment 12580View attachment 12581View attachment 12582View attachment 12583