Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
Your parallel to this is "I am the only person insane enough to think this, therefore I'm definitely right."
Wuhan Killer Sneeze (thanks Tea)
- Thread starter Turns out HMG was right!
- Start date
-
- Tags
- a grotesquely ugly freak ample cleavage bourgeois foodyism dunghill riddim fucking voodoo magic man jamaican voodoo gang from predator 2 linebaugh's balls ground into dust no no no no no no no no time is the true river that runs 'round hell wuhan ain't nuthing ta f' wit wuhan got you all in check
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
You would be a good peer-reviewer, heading off any academic progress at the pass because each time the paper says something new 😂
Abuse of peer review is truly shocking, has been for decades tho.
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
I'm perfectly happy to accept new ideas if there's good evidence for them. It's just that my standard for evidence is a bit higher than unreferenced Substack posts by generic grifting right-wing contrarians.
IdleRich
IdleRich
I'm dipping into all this nonsense for the first time in ages cos it seems clear that reading this thread regularly is literally damaging people's brains. But surely you can sThis is a normie line: most people don't do X which means X is wrong
He didn't say that at all, he said that feminists don't often make the argument that "Because most people aborted may be female we should ban abortion" - the inference to be drawn was clearly something along the lines of "Feminists don't say this, so feminists don't think this" or, in short, this is not a feminist argument. No comment is made as to rightness or wrongness, however it does seem like a relatively good way of rejecting your sneaky attempt to claim that you're making a feminist argument for abortion. Which you're not.
Anyway, I am exiting the brain-damage thread and, any attempt to draw me into it, from anyone at all, will be met with a robust and appropriate refusal along the lines of "Fuck off Biscuits you cunt" or if, was someone else, say @WashYourHands I might say something such as, I dunno "Oh, go fuck yourself Biscuits you dumb twat" or whatever.
He didn't say that at all, he said that feminists don't often make the argument that "Because most people aborted may be female we should ban abortion" - the inference to be drawn was clearly something along the lines of "Feminists don't say this, so feminists don't think this" or, in short, this is not a feminist argument. No comment is made as to rightness or wrongness, however it does seem like a relatively good way of rejecting your sneaky attempt to claim that you're making a feminist argument for abortion. Which you're not.
Anyway, I am exiting the brain-damage thread and, any attempt to draw me into it, from anyone at all, will be met with a robust and appropriate refusal along the lines of "Fuck off Biscuits you cunt" or if, was someone else, say @WashYourHands I might say something such as, I dunno "Oh, go fuck yourself Biscuits you dumb twat" or whatever.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
I didn't say I was making a feminist argument for abortion.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Leo
Well-known member
there couldn't possibly be any other reason for case numbers going up, there's air-tight scientific proof that people get sick as a direct result of getting vaxxed, right?
since few people actually get boosters, isn't most of the general population who get sick in these waves actually people who aren't boosted?
since few people actually get boosters, isn't most of the general population who get sick in these waves actually people who aren't boosted?
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
It is suggestive when one of the correlated variables consistently follows the other, as if it were dependent on it.