pattycakes_
Can turn naughty
Maybe people are more into your never boring several paragraph long drugalogues?
Any chance the tactic here is to appear more wholesome, even on a subliminal level, to have parents feel better about their kids intaking this shit?View attachment 16253View attachment 16254
Hes changed his strategy. Mouth closed now. Showing teeth, sign of aggression?
So you're a fan?From something I tried to write about MrBeast and his philantropic content:
In interviews, MrBeast talks about having been obsessed with Youtube since childhood. He hated school, had few friends, and cared about little else than making videos. He speaks proudly about the years he spent as a college dropout in manic pursuit of the formula for the viral video: the tone of voice, the quickness of the cuts, the colorgrading of the thumbnail. I think this part of the story is crucial to understanding what drives him, how his mind works.
To me what he represents is not narcissism but a sort of personality that only makes sense within its native domain of the internet, one that has internalized its binary laws, its own language of transactions, to a degree that is difficult to relate to. The absurdity of these videos doesn’t arise out of our encounter with something immoral, but with a morality whose natural terms has been abstracted away in the logic of content.
Reflecting on the spectacle of America seen from across the Atlantic, Baudrillard writes: “If you approach this society with the nuances of moral, aesthetic, or critical judgment, you will miss its originality, which comes precisely from its defying judgment and pulling off a prodigious confusion of effects.” Might there be a clue here to how we should approach a case like MrBeast, a phenomenon that itself appears dramatically capable of this confusion of effects: the good with the evil, the beautiful with the ugly?
My point is that if we suspend this continental weltschermz for a moment, isn’t there something genius about the enterprise MrBeast has designed? What he has created is a genuine perpetual engine of philanthropy, fused together by the moral and monetary circuits of the internet. It is a veritable Peter Pan-world with all its trappings, its eschewal of seriousness and moderation. Cringeworthy, yes, but also sort of magical.
I think there is something artful about all this, this paradox he presents us with, this bizarre recursion that short-circuits our moral instincts and turns our critical judgement into a part of the joke, into a part of his own grand revenge on the sensibility of adult life, which is left with little to say for itself except a bad taste in the mouth.
I mean he's completely ridiculous but in a visionary kind of waySo you're a fan?
YesI was going to do a thread about the concept of "Basic" but is this essentially that thread? I've not read any of it, you see.
Do you have the full peice or is this as far as you got?From something I tried to write about MrBeast and his philantropic content:
In interviews, MrBeast talks about having been obsessed with Youtube since childhood. He hated school, had few friends, and cared about little else than making videos. He speaks proudly about the years he spent as a college dropout in manic pursuit of the formula for the viral video: the tone of voice, the quickness of the cuts, the colorgrading of the thumbnail. I think this part of the story is crucial to understanding what drives him, how his mind works.
To me what he represents is not narcissism but a sort of personality that only makes sense within its native domain of the internet, one that has internalized its binary laws, its own language of transactions, to a degree that is difficult to relate to. The absurdity of these videos doesn’t arise out of our encounter with something immoral, but with a morality whose natural terms has been abstracted away in the logic of content.
Reflecting on the spectacle of America seen from across the Atlantic, Baudrillard writes: “If you approach this society with the nuances of moral, aesthetic, or critical judgment, you will miss its originality, which comes precisely from its defying judgment and pulling off a prodigious confusion of effects.” Might there be a clue here to how we should approach a case like MrBeast, a phenomenon that itself appears dramatically capable of this confusion of effects: the good with the evil, the beautiful with the ugly?
My point is that if we suspend this continental weltschermz for a moment, isn’t there something genius about the enterprise MrBeast has designed? What he has created is a genuine perpetual engine of philanthropy, fused together by the moral and monetary circuits of the internet. It is a veritable Peter Pan-world with all its trappings, its eschewal of seriousness and moderation. Cringeworthy, yes, but also sort of magical.
I think there is something artful about all this, this paradox he presents us with, this bizarre recursion that short-circuits our moral instincts and turns our critical judgement into a part of the joke, into a part of his own grand revenge on the sensibility of adult life, which is left with little to say for itself except a bad taste in the mouth.
There was more but this was the gist of it.Do you have the full peice or is this as far as you got?
glad 2 see chicago finally has somthing which is actually cool and good