mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Very poor paragraphing too.In all honesty, I never read your posts, poor signal:noise. What did you say, was it important/interesting?
Very poor paragraphing too.In all honesty, I never read your posts, poor signal:noise. What did you say, was it important/interesting?
So why did you reply and try and correct it if you didn't read it? How much signal to noise ratio was that gonna be?In all honesty, I never read your posts, poor signal:noise. What did you say, was it important/interesting?
"And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly."Yeah sure and when he said up he meant down but the Lieberal media don't get that without the hierophantic Dog Biscuits to explain why his God meant something different and much less loopy than what he actually said.
I got the gist by taking in all of your post as a single gestalt, a perk of being a 148 IQ magical thinker.So why did you reply and try and correct it if you didn't read it? How much signal to noise ratio was that gonna be?
Anyway, Rich's paranoid claims come from the outmoded 'Trump is a Nazi' notion which the Democrats have deprecated to 'Trump is weird'.
Is that a euphemism for cunt?I got the gist by taking in all of your post as a single gestalt, a perk of being a 148 IQ magical thinker.
You're determined to stretch the bounds of credibility by imagining that Trump effectively said that he had lied and had been caught lying. What makes your incompetent interpretation even more ridiculous is that he continued with the animal napping claim after his supposed confession. None of it would make sense but you oh so cunningly then say that that makes it more credible.Yeah sure and when he said up he meant down but the Lieberal media don't get that without the hierophantic Dog Biscuits to explain why his God meant something different and much less loopy than what he actually said.
"And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly."
You're determined to stretch the bounds of credibility by imagining that Trump effectively said that he had lied and had been caught lying. What makes your incompetent interpretation even more ridiculous is that he continued with the animal napping claim after his supposed confession. None of it would make sense but you oh so cunningly then say that that makes it more credible.
I didn't expect your moment to last for so long. Mrs Rich, fetch a pale of water. Can't you see his eyes are bulging out of his head!Trump is weird obviously. I mean you don't think an obese orange old man in a nappy who continually spouts lies, seems to fancy his daughter and loves the attention of a bunch of inbred four fingered fuckheads - and messy bitch titted fat midgets like you - is weird then you must be weird. Is he a nazi? I don't think so cos he's too dumb to actually follow any kind of ideology in any consistent way, but would he befriend Nazis for gain cos he realises they support him, of course he would.
You have the same understanding of the phrase 'walk it back' as version does of 'triggering'. You're a hysterical loon.Yeah that's what I just said isn't it? He said fine people on both sides, then he tried to walk it back a couple of minutes later. That still means he thinks that people who march with neo-nazis and white nationalists (which basically includes him) are just fine and dandy.
You have the same understanding of the phrase 'walk it back' as version does of 'triggering'. You're a hysterical loon.
It's elliptical for 'claimed debunk'...by the way, you've contradicted yourself because half the time you're saying he made a mistake and the other half you're saying he admitted lying - get your story straight!He said that. Obviously he didn't mean to say that. The reason he said it is cos he doesn't understand the meaning of the word debunked. Which is what I was sarcastically pointing out several pages ago.
I don't want to eviscerate version in this particular thread but when Trump says something moments after the statement you don't like and also precedes that statement with a similar comment, that doesn't constitute walking anything back.I don't really know what that first bit means but Version is a much smarter guy than you so I guess it's some kind of compliment, though why follow it up with the non-sequitur I dunno.
It's elliptical for 'claimed debunk'...by the way, you've contradicted yourself because half the time you're saying he made a mistake and the other half you're saying he admitted lying - get your story straight!