Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
Aside from his views on gender-affirming care, gay marriage, and abortion, I actually don’t take much issue with Vance, based on what I know now. I’d guess I’d take as much issue with him as I would Harris, but I’m not deeply familiar with either of them.

His Thiel connection and the Yarvin connection both weird me out, but it seems like you’re gonna get weird connections with any politician at this scale. As a progressive, social values wise, I wonder what issues other folks here take with him.

For me, I’m progressive in terms of social values, but classically liberal in terms of the role of government, which puts me in a weird overlap between Democratic and Republican values.
 

version

Well-known member
I'm fascinated to see how the internet and the ubiquity of smartphones, etc. plays into this. You often hear people claim the JFK assassination would have been wrapped up if it happened today, so this should be a good test of whether all this tech can lead to a stable narrative.

I think we already knew this would be the case, but the presence of smartphones clearly hasn't resulted in a definitive account of what happened.

There seems be consensus on the shooter being the person named, that he was on the identified rooftop, that he fired shots at Trump and hit members of the audience, that he was killed by the Secret Service, and so on, but that's mostly based on official reports and eyewitness testimony. The wave of blurry phone footage that hit social media's just led to rampant speculation on the behaviour of the Secret Service, picking out suspicious figures in the crowd, and general theorising and sensationalism. The existence of many Zapruder films just seems to lead to more questions.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
Aside from his views on gender-affirming care, gay marriage, and abortion, I actually don’t take much issue with Vance, based on what I know now. I’d guess I’d take as much issue with him as I would Harris, but I’m not deeply familiar with either of them.

His Thiel connection and the Yarvin connection both weird me out, but it seems like you’re gonna get weird connections with any politician at this scale. As a progressive, social values wise, I wonder what issues other folks here take with him.

For me, I’m progressive in terms of social values, but classically liberal in terms of the role of government, which puts me in a weird overlap between Democratic and Republican values.
I guess much of it also depends on if its true that Trump's would-be administration wants to replace nonpartisan career government bureaucrats with partisan ones. That could be overblown fearmongering from Democrats, but it could also be true. Even if it is true, its one thing to plan it, but its another thing to actually overhaul the personnel of a sprawling governmental apparatus within four years.
 

hmg

Victory lap
Come on, man! You know these "non partisans" are mainly DEI progressives (i.e. in fact highly partisan), and all those that are need to be mercilessly purged, then things can get better. They're the mangrove thicket that make up most of the swamp. Afuera!
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
Well honestly I don’t know the demographic makeup of US executive bureaucracy, but I’d prefer it to be as nonpartisan as possible. I’d like to say that career bureaucrats are good in this respect, but I also think that normalizing that too much may result in bureaucratic sprawl and bloat, which I think has good and bad consequences.
 

hmg

Victory lap
I may be wrong, but aren't the institutions that have fed government over the past two or three generations Gramscimaxxing Marxist spawning grounds? Whatever they are, these people are only American passing.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
I think we already knew this would be the case, but the presence of smartphones clearly hasn't resulted in a definitive account of what happened.

There seems be consensus on the shooter being the person named, that he was on the identified rooftop, that he fired shots at Trump and hit members of the audience, that he was killed by the Secret Service, and so on, but that's mostly based on official reports and eyewitness testimony. The wave of blurry phone footage that hit social media's just led to rampant speculation on the behaviour of the Secret Service, picking out suspicious figures in the crowd, and general theorising and sensationalism. The existence of many Zapruder films just seems to lead to more questions.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
The animating Democrat conspiracy theory that Trump will turn the US into a fascist dictatorship is unusual in that no-one actually seems to believe it. It's purely on the level of discourse to signal in-group affiliation. Why do I think no-one believes it? You can't get any odds on it from the bookies. So not a single person has placed a bet.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
The animating Democrat conspiracy theory that Trump will turn the US into a fascist dictatorship is unusual in that no-one actually seems to believe it. It's purely on the level of discourse to signal in-group affiliation. Why do I think no-one believes it? You can't get any odds on it from the bookies. So not a single person has placed a bet.
Well naturlich thats because, if it pans out, the bookies will be summarily gulaged and the would-be winnings confiscated to fund the erection of a bronze statue of Trump - and chiefly his erection, mind you.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
Well naturlich thats because, if it pans out, the bookies will be summarily gulaged and the would-be winnings confiscated to fund the erection of a bronze statue of Trump - and chiefly his erection, mind you.
Gulags were Communist; the thing that Americans think is the worst thing about Nazism was actually Communist. That is amazing.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
I'll bet anybody on this forum £100 that, should Trump be elected, the US will NOT become a one-party dictatorship. Barring Zelensky-like temporary changes because of war. Anyone willing to take me up on this?

I won't take bets on the Democrat party in particular being audited and dissolved, however.
 

version

Well-known member
The animating Democrat conspiracy theory that Trump will turn the US into a fascist dictatorship is unusual in that no-one actually seems to believe it. It's purely on the level of discourse to signal in-group affiliation. Why do I think no-one believes it? You can't get any odds on it from the bookies. So not a single person has placed a bet.

And because the Dems had four years to plan for the "most important election of our lifetimes" and still opted for a crumbling Biden-Harris ticket.
 
Top