IdleRich

IdleRich
Cracking football match yesterday I thought. Especially for the neutral (and those who, like me, had put some money on Liverpool) but I'm glad I'm not a fan of either side, I don't think that I could have stood the tension. Glad to see that Walcott looks as though he's maturing into the player that Sven thought he was before the World Cup, last few times I've seen him he's looked a lot more like a complete player and yesterday was a very strong run when in the past I reckon he wouldn't have been able to shrug off the first challenge and stay on his feet.
What about that penalty? I thought it was but then maybe I just hate Arsenal too much...
 

crackerjack

Well-known member
What about that penalty? I thought it was but then maybe I just hate Arsenal too much...

Absolute stick-on stonewall cert, as I've already said 100 times today to moaning Arsemen;):D:)

It's their own fault, they were brilliant and Liverpool were terrible for the first half hour. They could've had it sewn up before Hyppia scored. And just how rubbish does Senderos have to be before they give up on him?
 

nomos

Administrator
there wasn't much to the "penalty" i didn't think. careless jostling yes, but no grab and no feet. not as blatant as the hleb one last week at least. but obv. arsenal can't pin it all on that. their major problem has been not keeping their cool with a lead and killing games off. the story of both legs was arsenal taking leads and liverpool immediately striking back.

how do you hate arsenal? is it the current squad or something you were born into? i'm just curious because the only teams i can actually say i hate are man u and chelsea and that's down to fergie and a few spoiled players. maybe it's something to do with distance. i'm pretty immune to football culture over here, but on the other hand there are hockey teams i still revile even though i haven't followed the game for years.

walcott is finally starting to really shine. that run that got the second goal was amazing.
 
Last edited:

IdleRich

IdleRich
"how do you hate arsenal? is it the current squad or something you were born into?"
Hmm, it's more their fans who seem to have this sense of entitlement and are always going on about being the best team despite not ever winning anything. It's also Wenger's inability to see any of the fouls committed by his players but having perfect vision on the shocking treatment handed out to his thoroughbred darlings. Most of all it's the way that every time Arsenal are beaten by a side like Bolton they moan about how the minnow didn't play football and roughed them up - what do they expect them to do, try and outpass Arsenal and get beaten five nil? That's the beauty of football, you can be strong in so many different ways and the aim of the game is to make your strengths tell rather than the opponent's. I like the way they play and I enjoy watching them but there is something annoying about this insistence that they deserve to win because they do one part of the game well, they haven't realised that that's only part of the game and they have to do the rest as well if they're going to win the league.
I know every fan and manager and player for that matter is one-eyed but with Arsenal it just seems even more so than with other sides. Maybe my view on this is coloured because the goalie in my football team (a lecturer in South American literature and generally clever fellow) is one of the worst offenders in this respect I've ever had the pleasure of meeting.
 

mos dan

fact music
ha, not recently. having spent my entire life as a wimbledon (latterly afc) fan, i have recently adopted arsenal as a second team, having moved to n1 and moved in with three avid arsenal fans. there is probably no other team - let alone one in london - i would consider doing this for. in my experience arsenal fans are not more blinkered than others.

last night was heartbreaking in a way i haven't felt since the year wombles were knocked out of two cup semi finals. (obviously the heartbreak of having your club STOLEN FROM YOU is on a scale so enormous that it does not warrant mention in a discussion about mere football matches.)

as someone whose formative football years were the 90s, i revile man utd, their players, their manager, their supporters, their groundsman.. you get the idea ;)

i can happily state that cristiano ronaldo is the best player in the world and a joy to watch, and also that i despise him with every fibre of my being. such is being a football fan eh :)
 

crackerjack

Well-known member
i can happily state that cristiano ronaldo is the best player in the world and a joy to watch, and also that i despise him with every fibre of my being. such is being a football fan eh :)

He is the best player in the world, and I hate him, but I also hate watching him because he's the best player in the world. And then I hate myself for being so small-minded, which makes me hate him even more.
 

crackerjack

Well-known member
We've got the semi-finals most of us predicted. Anyone put anything on it?

The semis are much harder to call, but i have a sense of doom that this is Man U's year. Maybe vidic will still be out and Barca will rip them to shreds, but if not I think I'd almost rather Chelsea beat Liverpool cos i can't bear the thought of losing to Utd in the final.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
"We've got the semi-finals most of us predicted. Anyone put anything on it?"
Nah, but I bet on Liverpool to beat Arsenal (and won on the Grand National thanks to my mysterious dissensus tipster) so I'm happy.
It's weird that Manchester United have eased to the semis without ever being under pressure or playing a really top drawer side - the best team they've played on paper is Roma (twice), a side they utterly humiliated last year. Who would have thought they would have been able to rest Rooney and Ronaldo in the quarter finals of the cup and stroll past one of the top Italian sides without breaking sweat. How the balance of power has shifted with England supplying six of the eight semi-finalists over the last two years.

"The semis are much harder to call, but i have a sense of doom that this is Man U's year. Maybe vidic will still be out and Barca will rip them to shreds, but if not I think I'd almost rather Chelsea beat Liverpool cos i can't bear the thought of losing to Utd in the final."
I don't see Barcelona ripping United to shreds as Messi is out for one game and Ronaldinho for both but they are still dangerous. It's going to be a tough game and it ought to be a good one. Shame Puyol is out though 'cause he's fucking rubbish.
 

crackerjack

Well-known member
I don't see Barcelona ripping United to shreds as Messi is out for one game and Ronaldinho for both but they are still dangerous. It's going to be a tough game and it ought to be a good one. Shame Puyol is out though 'cause he's fucking rubbish.

He's starting to look more and more like Campo, and not just the hair.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
"I know every fan and manager and player for that matter is one-eyed but with Arsenal it just seems even more so than with other sides."
Here's what I'm on about...

The Gunners' title aspirations were well and truly shattered yesterday when they were defeated 2-1 by league leaders Manchester United at Old Trafford, opening up a surely insurmountable nine-point gap between the two.
And while Wenger yet again bemoaned refereeing decisions not going in their favour, he insists he is nevertheless proud of his team's performance.
"We lost on a penalty - that you can give or not give but we are used to that now - and on a free-kick when Gilberto did not touch him. I believe these two decisions made a big difference.
"We have to take it but overall I am proud of my team."
Only Wenger could feel hard-done-by in a game when his side's only goal was clearly scored by Adebayor punching the ball into the net (incidentally that was the only way that Adebayor was going to score).
 

mos dan

fact music
yeah the adebayor goal was a joke, but so was that free kick being given for nothing. i still don't think you have a case that arsenal fans are more one-eyed than anyone else. (1) wenger is not arsenal fans, he is the manager. (2) watch the post-match interviews on motd back to back - pretty much all the managers will take a ridiculously biased line.

the dubious goals aside, the referee was pretty disgraceful imo, arsenal got some silly yellow cards for nothing, and as ever at old trafford it felt like there was a forcefield protecting the man u players from the same fate.

in my part of north ldn we were taking comfort from the possibility that man u might be sunk by a global recession, as they're both in debt and sponsored by an insurance company. hence the chant "down with the dollar, you're going down with the doooooollaaaar" ;)
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
"wenger is not arsenal fans, he is the manager"
Well, I said "fans and manager" didn't I?

"watch the post-match interviews on motd back to back - pretty much all the managers will take a ridiculously biased line."
Yeah, of course you're right but Wenger just seems to go that much further to me. Obviously it's only the impression I get but it was nicely reinforced by him having the nerve to blame the ref when he gave them the only goal they managed. They should get a striker who can keep his composure and then they might give themselves a chance.

"the dubious goals aside, the referee was pretty disgraceful imo, arsenal got some silly yellow cards for nothing,"
Van Persie (I think it was) was booked wrongly when he got the ball but the other bookings all looked pretty clear as far as I can recall.
 

vimothy

yurp
in my part of north ldn we were taking comfort from the possibility that man u might be sunk by a global recession, as they're both in debt and sponsored by an insurance company. hence the chant "down with the dollar, you're going down with the doooooollaaaar" ;)

Unless they've planned for recession, and the use of debt is part of an innovative hedge against dollar devaluation (borrow large amounts of money; invest in a tangible asset (Old Trafford); watch as asset value inflates; pay back debt in worthless nominal currency; pocket the difference).
 

mos dan

fact music
Yeah, of course you're right but Wenger just seems to go that much further to me.

he does have a remarkable ability to always view things through a prism of injustice, i concede. i like it when managers pull an aidy boothroyd and say 'my players were useless, that's why we lost. they need to do better'.

in fact let's flip this, who is the most honest manager?
 

crackerjack

Well-known member
Managers of the major clubs habitually criticise refs disproportionately, not just out of anger but as a tactic. (Wenger, if anything, is slightly less culpable in this respect, since he seems the most emotional of all the top UK managers). Note the difference between Rafa then (rarely criticised refs publicly) and Rafa now (as bad an any of them).

I blame Ferguson*, who began this practice, or at least made it notable, though it took Mourinho to turn it into an artform.

If one of the big 4 gets a crap decision against them, it can be back page news for days. for a lesser club, it's a minute's gripe on MOTD and a paragraph in the match report. Refs know this, and act acordingly. When clattenberg (I think) gave that mental penalty for Chelsea at Liverpool earlier this season, he was dropped from the Prem list for a month. When Styles gave one just as stupid against Man City recently, nothing happened.

*But then I would.
 
Last edited:
Top