Well, you can be technical and enjoyable. But some of the best players weren't at their best (eg Torres). It could have been better!
Also, I thought it was weird ITV saying it was an all time classic when the game was effectively dead for half of the second half, when all the exciting goals happened. Between Alex's and Kuyt's, Liverpool were always at least two goals behind. And there were again after Lampard's.
So whilst the goals were flying in, they didn't really matter...
The game only felt dead after Lampard's two goals, a total of about 10 mins.
At 2-2 I always thought Liverpool had a chance with Chelsea defending so nervily.
And what do you nmean about "all the exciting goals"? What could be more exciting than beating a keeper at his near post from 35 yards?
There have been loads of nin-nil draws at a higher technical level but so what?
Well I find that quite exciting. But I agree that on that performance it's hard to see Chelsea beating Barce.'i can't believe this is happening
Come join me in purist snobs' corner, Baboon! We'll drink port and discuss total football![]()
Where you can watch the 2003 CL final - a technically magnificent 0-0 Milanese derby where the only moment of true drama was watching the Milan keeper charge about 10ft from his line, unpunished, during the penalty shoot-out - on loop.