l o v e

N

nomadologist

Guest
hohoho. gee thanks ;)

I did not mean that to be offensive!! But even in disagreeing with certain points Gek and I made, it seemed to me a given in your post that you had the same concerns about the all-pervasiveness of capital's grip on desire.

Sorry:slanted:
 

turtles

in the sea
I did not mean that to be offensive!! But even in disagreeing with certain points Gek and I made, it seemed to me a given in your post that you had the same concerns about the all-pervasiveness of capital's grip on desire.

Sorry:slanted:
haha, don't worry about it. just poking you a bit.
 
N

nomadologist

Guest
How did a thread on love get to the cyborg?

I love Dissensus.
 
N

nomadologist

Guest
and the reverse also tho Noel... Nomad's "being thrown" sounds scarily accurate to me...

I think you would really enjoy Heidegger. Really very much, especially if you're reading Badiou. Without Heidegger there would definitely be no Badiou.

EDIT: Also, Badiou's best work is on D&G's indebtedness to Heidegger--something that often goes completely overlooked or misunderstood.
 
Last edited:

noel emits

a wonderful wooden reason
and the reverse also tho Noel... Nomad's "being thrown" sounds scarily accurate to me...
Well 'being thrown' just makes me think of dwarves.

I have no idea about something called 'essentialism' so I can't have mentioned it. If I said 'essence' it was just to denote what is there in a person underneath and preceding a constructed personality. For some people this is further away than others.
 
N

nomadologist

Guest
Yes.

I also am not working so I just watch YouTube all day.
 

gek-opel

entered apprentice
I think you would really enjoy Heidegger. Really very much, especially if you're reading Badiou. Without Heidegger there would definitely be no Badiou.

EDIT: Also, Badiou's best work is on D&G's indebtedness to Heidegger--something that often goes completely overlooked or misunderstood.

Being and Time sits half digested on my shelf as we speak...
 

Gavin

booty bass intellectual
How did a thread on love get to the cyborg?

Blame Burial/swears for everything.

I am very apprehensive about the cyborg manifesto though... but this is because I think at heart I am more vulgar marxist than a cheerleader for schizoanalytic posthumanity... The rich will always have the better bionic parts.. The idea of literal, direct physical control of bodies through technology scares me more than MMO techno-portal worlds, though both are related of course.
 
N

nomadologist

Guest
Blame Burial/swears for everything.

I am very apprehensive about the cyborg manifesto though... but this is because I think at heart I am more vulgar marxist than a cheerleader for schizoanalytic posthumanity... The rich will always have the better bionic parts.. The idea of literal, direct physical control of bodies through technology scares me more than MMO techno-portal worlds, though both are related of course.

But the poor have high-speed internet already! (good point, really good point)
 
N

nomadologist

Guest
Being and Time sits half digested on my shelf as we speak...

That one's so monolithic and "classic" it's harder to take, but mid-Heidegger is my jam. It was some of the first philosophy I read and loved, really really influenced me from a young age.

So to tell another one of my secrets, my outspoken D&G love is by way of a huge amount of self-examination and questioning my strongest impulses toward modernist ontology to be completely honest.

Now I really feel naked.
 
N

nomadologist

Guest
yeah I know, Gavin speaks from that borderline between Marx and Freud and D&G that's hard to hash out, I have a hard time with it
 

turtles

in the sea
Ha! found it! From this lecture. I don't necessarily agree with everything (the guy's a bit of a weirdo) but nonetheless I think this is sort of the standard view of embodiment with regard to technology, in the engineering/CS fields.

embodiment.jpg
 

Gavin

booty bass intellectual
Tis good yat the moment yes... is everyone just dodging midterms like me or what?

I'm dodging grading a bunch of papers... if my students only knew how relieved I am whenever one of them neglects to turn in something...
 

noel emits

a wonderful wooden reason
Why does everyone on here refer to ideas other people have hashed out long ago and better than any of us could, when they haven't read these source texts (which is fine, nothing wrong with that)-- and then get mad at those who have? What gives?
I'm referring to my thoughts about things, hopefully some real things and not just ideas.

It's about getting to something valuable, useful and real.

Not everything someone says relates to some 'source text', especially when they are using perfectly ordinary words in common usage.
 
Top