hundredmillionlifetimes
Banned
@ HMLT - For someone so sensitive to being 'slandered' you sure do dish it out. If you're going to put words in people's mouths so you can proceed to call them 'scumbags' and tell them to go fuck themselves, then maybe you shouldn't bother posting here anymore (again). I/we have been trying to give you the benefit of the doubt the last few months. At your best, you're one of the most informed and eloquent posters on this forum. ).
I'm sorry to have to inform you, but anyone who systematically defends those who engage in and promote mass murder is accurately so described. Perhaps you've a 'better' suggestion for the proper use of such a term ... Shouldn't you now be eagerly inviting Vimothy back so he can continue his virulent agenda (not that you ever intervened to question it, much less ever suggested that he not bother posting here anymore)?
Listen, Nomos, I called tate a scumbag for a very specific and justifiable reason, a reason that in your post here you suitably choose to ignore and censure: he chose to slander me with his hysterical allegation of being 'sexist' in accurately describing Clinton as a political slut. Why didn't you intervene there and take HIM to task, with the suggestion that "maybe he shouldn't bother posting here anymore"?? I await his apology ...
But, as you've demonstrated in this thread, you often seem more interested in bilious diatribes and name calling than real discussion (by which I mean honest dialogue/debate/argument, not normative standards of politically correct consensus/exchanges of pleasantries as you've argued in the past
I really don't require dishonest flattery to be quickly followed by twisted insult. If you really make an effort here, and actually consult the previous posts on this thread, you might surmise that tate began this 'name calling' by calling me 'sexist' for referring to a mass murderer as a 'political slut'.
It is he you need to be taking to task here, or don't tell me that you too are a Clinton supporter?
And frankly, I find nothing whatsoever honest about the majority of the responses I've received on this thread, first completely evading Clinton's actual policies to engage in hopelessly displaced, personalised 'sexist' allegations, and now, through you, resorting via startling intimidation to try and silence me.
Are you sure YOU should be 'bothering' to post here, Nomos?
Because I'm treating this latest post of your's as a direct threat to my legitimacy as a poster here ... [but let's have loads more pro-Bell Curve white-supremicist threads! They're sooo polite! Unlike those nasty people who complain about them!]
[How more right-wing can a forum get?]