I once DJd at SubCyberia, that being the 'smart bar' underneath the Cyberia Internet cafe, the first and at the time only one of it's kind in London. DJ Spooky was present and quite possibly receiving a shiatsu while I played ambient techno records. I think this is the most (appallingly) 90s moment I can remember.oh forgot to mention:
dj spooky is not appropriate for ANY occasion, social or private.
in fact, it is not appropriate to bring up his name. i think people should be banned for it.
I have also had a conversation with a member of Aufgehoben and he explained to me how, in a manner analogous to Burial's 'fishtails', his process involved getting the waveforms of their recordings to resemble solid blocks in CoolEdit.* That really is a most obstreperous choice of dinner party music.You should tell him to get their next album mastered a bit louder - it needs a little more 'oomph'.![]()
I have also had a conversation with a member of Aufgehoben and he explained to me how, in a manner analogous to Burial's 'fishtails', his process involved getting the waveforms of their recordings to resemble solid blocks in CoolEdit.*
my choice for dinner parties is usually jazz piano, like monk solo or any number of other classic or modern artists.
last time someone came to my house for dinner i put on south of heaven by slayer, the slower album after reign in blood.
It's actually quite a challenge to find something that 1) you like, 2) appeals enough to your better half, 3) doesn't upset the guests and 4) avoids the usual safepath of going exotic/retro (jazz, chanson, french folk, world music, etc). First three are quite easy, but only if you ignore number four.
why is number four even a concern to begin with? also you realize the breadth and variety you lump up in that section is several thousand times broader than all of your other sections added together.
when it comes to taste, specifically when in search for a supposedly shared taste, alot of people rely on said safepaths.
I think there is a degree of 'safeness' coming from the fact that not many people in the west know much about non-western music, and in particular they're far less likely to have a violent objection to something that they aren't already familiar with, provided it's not totally unpalatable. Plus there's the perception that 'world music' is automatically interesting and exotic and shows off the host's breadth of taste by dint of being nonwestern without anyone having to engage with it on a level of content.pardon me if it isn't, but it seems to be the case:
why would you consider, say, playing a recording of Andalusian Nubah music, any more "safe", than putting on Selected Ambient Works vol. 1, for instance?
from where i'm standing a selection outside of proscribed cultural norms is much more challenging
than staying within cliche western hipster or avant garde cannons.
i find it objectionable that someone would say something like it is "safe" to play "world music" on so many different levels -- but the main one being the mis and under informed smugness of european ethnocentric attitudes.
I think there is a degree of 'safeness' coming from the fact that not many people in the west know much about non-western music, and in particular they're far less likely to have a violent objection to something that they aren't already familiar with, provided it's not totally unpalatable. Plus there's the perception that 'world music' is automatically interesting and exotic and shows off the host's breadth of taste by dint of being nonwestern without anyone having to engage with it on a level of content.
IOW it's a shit feature of western music tastes that it's often 'safe' to play anything nonwestern but it is a feature.
zhao said:i find it objectionable that someone would say something like it is "safe" to play "world music" on so many different levels -- but the main one being the mis and under informed smugness of european ethnocentric attitudes.