always a scene out there ripe for the hype machine
"innit"
chewed up and spit out within months
It'd be nice if there were a better word for this stuff, but I've come to believe that once a term's in use (the dreaded "mnml") there's little you can do to halt the juggernaut...
which makes it more interesting as a meme than an actual genre, which in itself is a very interesting thing as it means that it moves beyond dance music genres into a weird kind of game of association. Maybe that's where we're going that's where we came from.
I don't think the idm crowd, which was a long time ago now, and the people that are interested in wonky are the same at all, the nights i've been to are very young mixed kinda hip hop heads, the music is mixed up and the tempos are too.
Basically haters are hating on it here.
IDM
Coffee tables
Chill out for Dubsteppers
Students
Burial probably loves it
Beards
Tweed
Sunday Supplements
Trying to be raw
Trip Hop
Quite like it
Boring
psherbourne said:It'd be nice if there were a better word for this stuff, but I've come to believe that once a term's in use (the dreaded "mnml") there's little you can do to halt the juggernaut...
it's not exactly a juggernaut yet! it's only appeared recently in a few articles, sparking a bit of discussion - mostly people asking for clarification.
even 'aquacrunk''s been written about in the guardian.
i dont know anyone making, playing (or releasing) music which has been termed wonky who likes the phrase being used as a genre... weird things will and can catch on i suppose.
there definitely is a theme of synthy, lopsided, tracks coming from producers of late... and it's all getting bundled together, which is probably about right as it is a theme... but not really a genre (for me at least).
so basically like mms says:
YES
Haha. Way too many chips on shoulders and inaccuracies in there to even get started.
Here's a thought exercise: can all the writers on here actively refrain from using "wonky," from using any tag whatsoever, and simply describe the music on its own terms?
i'm sticking with aquacrunk because it's a very very funny word - best genre name to be invented in many moons. until the wonky juggernaut overtakes... though surely a wonky juggernaut would veer of the road? ho ho ho.
(btw it wasn't me wot used aquacrunk in the guardian fwiw, was probably prancehall?)
yeah man i like aquacrunk and lazerbass way more as well. here's that article
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2008/oct/20/aquacrunk-scene-and-heard
not heard of the writer.. article is kind of silly though.
dan - on your point about reactionary forum types, i think it's kind of different with this. i feel uncomfortable seeing this stuff in its own charts, people talking about 'wonky' nights etc, because to me this stuff feels valuable as an aspect of a lot of different scenes which already exist (and blackdowns column this month, just to cover all my bases, makes this very clear). to me anyway, not putting words in anyone elses mouth, the problem is that what makes this music exciting is at least partly the context in which the different artists have developed, and removing 'wonky' music from that context devalues both the music and the term - wonky in comparison to what? it's a different thing to prescribing a word to cover a group of artists and nights that are already working together. 'it's all music' is a pet peeve of mine too but i don't think that's the issue in this case.
yeah man i like aquacrunk and lazerbass way more as well. here's that article
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2008/oct/20/aquacrunk-scene-and-heard
not heard of the writer.. article is kind of silly though.