this sounds fantastic if the people in power buy into it. which, ah...
I mean like most things having to do w/democracy this all works better the more affluence there is, more surplus of power so to speak. but there isn't enough affluence to go around is there...
"Sure, why not?"
Well, I don't know. Is there a more-or-less equal distribution of child sex slaves in every world city?
I mean, the tard gallery is having fun letting this thread descend into chaos, as they usually do when their idiotic arguments have been shown up for the nonsense that they are, so have fun with it.
In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
what the hell does this actually mean? I know it's some kind of play in words but what concept is it supposed to express?
Padraig -- http://williambader.com/ingirum.html
It's usually translated as something like, "We go round and round in the night and are consumed by the fire".
EDIT: Although Nomad's translation is more literal.
Yeah, and they usually don't. But does that mean those who do should stop?
I mean, the tard gallery is having fun letting this thread descend into chaos, as they usually do when their idiotic arguments have been shown up for the nonsense that they are, so have fun with it.
actually I dunno I thought it was pretty interesting until, no offense, you showed up. not that I agreed with everything that was put forward but I dunno, it was a discourse. not that discourse has to be civil. anyway.
no, it doesn't mean "those who do" should stop. but 1) they're in the minority, certainly, over the long run of history & 2) anyone who buys into isn't the problem, yuhfeelme?
Hardy har har. So funny.
oh lighten up a bit
![]()
Yes, of course, I agree with you. Isn't that obvious?
The metaphor of the derailing thread is quite interesting. It is a crazily mixed-metaphor. The thread is a train, and the train is a thread. Either, it was going to get somewhere, or sew everything up. I guess it starts sewing mutantly, and spins into oblivion.