line b
Well-known member
@constant escape
Yes an no. Your right to call it energy accumulation. Thats effectively how they understand money, among other things. But your wrong to say there are more and more ways to for the magma to reach surface. They say the opposite is true, because of that energy (desire) accumulation. So look at the primitive society, pre money. Energy is immediately released into the social system, creating new alliances and debts. When energy is accumulated in the oedipilizied society, its robbed of that productive capability. Rather than affecting change, this productive capacity sits inert, accumulated in cash. (This is not to say that desire=money or they are arguing for some anarcho primitivism though, I'm just trying to be concise).
They refer to the pre Oedipal society as the bush and the oedipilized the desert. Think about the complexity of the bush, all the interactions of plants and animals compared to the barren desert. Oedipilization is a turn away from complexity. This is right in line with our societies of control/discipline conversation in the mark fisher thread (which I think you were a part of?)
As for the last question Im not sure. What do you mean?
Yes an no. Your right to call it energy accumulation. Thats effectively how they understand money, among other things. But your wrong to say there are more and more ways to for the magma to reach surface. They say the opposite is true, because of that energy (desire) accumulation. So look at the primitive society, pre money. Energy is immediately released into the social system, creating new alliances and debts. When energy is accumulated in the oedipilizied society, its robbed of that productive capability. Rather than affecting change, this productive capacity sits inert, accumulated in cash. (This is not to say that desire=money or they are arguing for some anarcho primitivism though, I'm just trying to be concise).
They refer to the pre Oedipal society as the bush and the oedipilized the desert. Think about the complexity of the bush, all the interactions of plants and animals compared to the barren desert. Oedipilization is a turn away from complexity. This is right in line with our societies of control/discipline conversation in the mark fisher thread (which I think you were a part of?)
As for the last question Im not sure. What do you mean?