What is Deleuze?

woops

woops

is not like other people
Clinamenic said:
Click to expand...

recommended to other readers, classic stan, i could actually understand most of that though

no mention of us trying to influence you to incorporate reading prynne into the modular education program from a second order perspective though

i really like the picture by the way
 
Murphy

Murphy

cat malogen
got one sprog home with the trots, let me survive past 7pm without killing anyone and will rinse thoroughly
 
Murphy

Murphy

cat malogen
I’d read more on dsm protocols and how stupid they can be, how reductive, to tap into multi-source critiques on what is, admittedly, a highly politicised field. Agency brings in Giddens, Bourdieu, Butler et al but you could link neuroplasticity and taskscapes as performance niche, ie when entering a field of subjectivity practice focused in on extended research goals, before pulling back and re-entering consensus reality (did someone say dopamine reward?) and all its nefarious social domains

Your plasticity model works better if you factor in age - you’re at an age when modelling reality through learning is still in development. We’re all always learning but you have a systems-integration approach mapped onto what is essentially wish fulfilment by proxy - by magic. How could we integrate it to, say, a 60-something retraining for a new life? Is it replicable? Can it be extended? What if you get stuck amidst in-focus mode? How could you remain sane? Phenomenology leapt out reading here - sensory engagement in the world, being, dwelling, tasks, layers of consciousness (depth psych) etc

Magic? By definition, perhaps, a poetic intersection linked to science, religion and art. By practice? Possibly. You mention trauma and you could slip a Burroughs wishful thinking allusion in or a nod to the Ugly Spirit because of its unyielding omnipotence in the human journey. Maybe condense the same approach but you do need far more than SBC‘s take as an underpinning/unifying principle of pathology if the scope of your work is centred on it - where you could manoeuvre it and a best practice guide
 
Clinamenic

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
WashYourHands said:
I’d read more on dsm protocols and how stupid they can be, how reductive, to tap into multi-source critiques on what is, admittedly, a highly politicised field. Agency brings in Giddens, Bourdieu, Butler et al but you could link neuroplasticity and taskscapes as performance niche, ie when entering a field of subjectivity practice focused in on extended research goals, before pulling back and re-entering consensus reality (did someone say dopamine reward?) and all its nefarious social domains

Your plasticity model works better if you factor in age - you’re at an age when modelling reality through learning is still in development. We’re all always learning but you have a systems-integration approach mapped onto what is essentially wish fulfilment by proxy - by magic. How could we integrate it to, say, a 60-something retraining for a new life? Is it replicable? Can it be extended? What if you get stuck amidst in-focus mode? How could you remain sane? Phenomenology leapt out reading here - sensory engagement in the world, being, dwelling, tasks, layers of consciousness (depth psych) etc

Magic? By definition, perhaps, a poetic intersection linked to science, religion and art. By practice? Possibly. You mention trauma and you could slip a Burroughs wishful thinking allusion in or a nod to the Ugly Spirit because of its unyielding omnipotence in the human journey. Maybe condense the same approach but you do need far more than SBC‘s take as an underpinning/unifying principle of pathology if the scope of your work is centred on it - where you could manoeuvre it and a best practice guide
Click to expand...
A best practice guide would be marvelous, and yeah any movement in that direction would take a lot more familiarity with the discourse than I have.

It also seems like part of what I’m talking about here is psychoplasticity, which seems to have a different set of constraints than neuroplasticity, and could in some ways span equipotently across age, unlike neuroplasticity.

It really feels like an operationalized psychosis: being able to identify the common reality, and a two-way trajectory away from and back toward it. The apogee would be the crosshairs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top