The big Spinoza one is more difficult but it's considered a classic in Spinoza scholarship.I'm reading the Spinoza one atm. It's not that clear, but it's a bit easier than Anti-Oedipus.
Gilles Deleuze from A to Z is on YouTube.
I’m also curious about a certain definition of philosophy, as the generation of useful concepts, which I think is considered the deleuzian approach to philosophy, but I don’t know if this is true or, if it is, where Deleuze explains.
I’m curious to learn more about what Deleuze-guattari have to say about nomadology and Rhizomatics and schizoanalysis - which work of theirs should I check out? @linebaugh @version ? I got four sections into a thousand plateaus, not sure if it has what I’m looking for. I’m seeking to apply schizoanalysis to Machiavelli’s political theories, and I don’t want to mischaracterize D-G.
Yeah it was a few years ago I started it, haven’t picked it up since, but what you’re describing does sound like exactly what I’m looking for.Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Those are the books on that stuff. I'm not sure what you're after if ATP didn't cover it. It has a chapter specifically on the rhizome. And AO introduces schizoanalysis. The final chapter's called 'Introduction to Schizoanalysis'.
The worst mistake people make is to start with What is Philosophy? - no, they don't explain it!
Exactly, so cut the snark versh!To be fair, with these guys I suppose a title's no guarantee. As Craner infamously observed on page one...
I guess part of what I’m curious about is whether it’s worth working through these dense books to get a practical sense of this stuff, but on the other hand I also just want to do a bit of due diligence if I’m gonna be using these concepts. Also it was a while ago that I started ATP (never read Anti Oedipus) and I honestly just don’t recall what I read, because I didn’t really have an intended application of the knowledge (which I think generally helps in terms of retention) until now.
Yeah good point, think I’ll have to read these.You could probably get away with just reading interviews and guidebooks, but I think you should read them. Better to be a blagger who didn't understand the book than one who didn't read it.
To be fair, with these guys I suppose a title's no guarantee. As Craner infamously observed on page one...
I guess part of what I’m curious about is whether it’s worth working through these dense books