I meant history of philosophy books. Sure, call them interpretative books if you want. But when it comes to the history of philosophy, they're as good as it gets.
'D for Desire' is a pretty good overview of Anti-Oedipus, but it's funny to hear him stress the simplicity of his and Guattari's concepts when he knows full well the book isn't written the way he explains it in the interview.
There's a good bit in 'G for Gauche' where he says he never became a communist like some of his friends because he couldn't stand the meetings and people going round with petitions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.