and yeah i didnt specify - the whole tack seems to be that there is no finalising resolve to contradiction/that infinity cant be totalised/that negation is always the case
still operating on the theological-scholemian level so apologies for imprecision of terms, its been 8 years since ive tried to grok marx and marxists where theyre at.
that bordiga piece is classic and id even say its a throughline to his thought, ie a primitivist reading is already plausible, explains camatte's heel turn
you are correct that the primitivists can trace themselves to Bordiga, even if he was not one himself.
As for the theological aspects: certainly the universe as we know it will end one day, hence the concept of kiyamet in Islam. But we might not even be able to ascertain what comes afterwards, assuming we can even speak in such a chronological way. In this sense I find the idea of there being an ultimate resolve of the dialectical method to be fallacious, if dialectics are the laws of thought, then what must resolve are contradictions, but the dialectic must keep acting as a solvent which dissolves and corrodes all history.
Dialectics is an acidic agent.