nomadthethird
more issues than Time mag
Definitely no longer than five years. 'They' proved it.
Why would acid go in your "spine" anyway? It has a first-pass metabolism in the liver doesn't it?
Definitely no longer than five years. 'They' proved it.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Re being picky, Just being pickier about who you decide to fuck doesn't mean you have a lower libido. For millions of years, before you had safe, legal, accessible abortions and contraception widely available, it was women who were left holding the bag (a screaming infant) after a night of sex. The high likelihood that a child has of sharing some of its father's traits means that most women don't want to be left taking care of a little douchebag replicant. So most women try to "mate" with men they find attractive on multiple levels, not just the physical one, because they're effectively always forced into thinking about potential mates as potential fathers for their offspring. Women now are probably going to tend this way, toward being picky, due to our biology having formed around this strategy over millions of years, despite having access to better pregnancy planning methods. Men, now, as always, walk alway from a recreational sexual encounter more likely to be unscathed by said screaming infant.
Child support payments could be seen as something of an evolutionary counterweight.Men, now, as always, walk alway from a recreational sexual encounter more likely to be unscathed by said screaming infant.
I can think of several books and one film where horses having sex is used as a scene to get either the characters or the viewer in the mood and I wouldn't say that they were books aimed at women - in fact one was by Wilbur Smith I think which is probably about as masculine as you can get."Bear in mind that women may not want to have sex with the bonobo from the movie, but they may be aroused and want to have sex in one form or another--with themselves or another human-- after watching bonobo sex movies."
Re being picky, Just being pickier about who you decide to fuck doesn't mean you have a lower libido.
Men, now, as always, walk alway from a recreational sexual encounter more likely to be unscathed by said screaming infant.
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Ok, I think I can tie this Bonobo sex tangent and this drugs topic together in an anecdote. On a recent airplane trip, I had the good fortune of sitting next to one Gladys Friedler, a developmental pharmacologist, aged 80-something, noted folk-singer of the 1950s----her research was on the effect of a father's drug ingestion of a fetus, a topic handily overlooked by her colleagues and predecessors. She found her research ignored, or worse, for something like forty years until recent findings validated her life's work. Basically, as she told me on a three hour flight, she dosed a female mouse some opiates (i forgot which) and found that the offspring had slightly lower birthweight, but nothing significant, particularly when compared to the results when the father mouse was dosed----the offspring of mice with the father mouse dosed had a significantly lower birth weight, and a laundry list of defects. basically, she found that these opiates are mutagens.
A little googling turned up the name of her paper:
“Paternal Exposures: Impact on Reproductive and Developmental Outcomes. An Overview. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior"
besides that she told me of seeing the birth of the acid scene in late sixties san francisco. she also related a story of seeing jefferson airplane in 68 or 69, everyone dosed out their minds, and going into the bathroom to collect herself, and finding women shooting up heroin. she said she didn't do drugs herself, on account of her line of work... she was basically describing the death throws of the flower children.
ack. i've typed too much.
[/FONT]
Well yes, this is just the point I was making.
Certainly not guaranteed to be unscathed though, in a country with things like paternity tests and a child support agency (which, it goes without saying, are obviously Good Things). Not that paying money for a long time is in quite the same league as having a kid to bring up, of course.
And no, throwing money at a child is not the same as taking an active and interested role in its development as a human being.
the was basically her experience doing the research---it was dismissed largely because the (male) establishment perceived her efforts as "picking on" males.But no one focuses on this, because, as in most sexual matters, people would prefer to moralize only at women, and judge them, and limit them, and contain them via control-mechanisms like objectification.
.
"wAgAwAgA" Seems pretty psychadellic to me. inhabits a very strange space anyway following a dub/dubstep sort of frame and pushing it with some weird sonics. Well worth a listen. www.myspace.com/splagawagawaga . His album is up for free download thorugh here-> http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=78026590&blogID=452999350
the was basically her experience doing the research---it was dismissed largely because the (male) establishment perceived her efforts as "picking on" males.
just reading up on paternal exposure in another book confirmed that it was Morphine that friedler was using in her tests. she found that paternal exposure to morphine negatively effected not only the offspring of the exposed males, but also, the second generation of mice.
haven't read it but this book leans heavily on friedler and takes a political approach to the science of male reproduction
i, frankly, have little exposure to any of this stuff (except for ancient greek ideas of reproduction), i am just here for the psychedelic music, man!
edit: i have been volleying emails with gladys this week---i'm sure she'd be chuffed to know we are talking about her work. our emails are just about folk music. i keep trying to get her to listen to my radio show but she's got dial-up and can't figure it out. maybe i will ask her to sign up here and contribute to this psychedelic bonobo sex thread!
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
A little googling turned up the name of her paper:
“Paternal Exposures: Impact on Reproductive and Developmental Outcomes. An Overview. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior"
[/FONT]
Will you make a jukebox for me?
interesting paper/topic on a subject that has been overlooked for quite some time, and is still, afaik, underdeveloped. i have read quite a few studies on paternal alcohol consumption and links to certain genetic disorders/birth defects/birth weights. turner syndrome has been linked to paternal alcoholism, and there has been some discussion/study towards paternal alcohol and drug consumption and autism/hyperactivity in offspring (most notably male offspring).
But with things like autism which (I presume) aren't immediately apparent at birth, how are congenital effects distinguished from the environmental influence of having a junky or an alcoholic for a father?