Don't know anything about Prynne, haven't heard of him outside of Dissensus.
As for interpretation, in a way I see it as a metadialectic, one dialectic between readers looking to come to a conclusion, and another dialectic between readers going their own way and unconcerned with a single/optimal reading. In a way, the second isn't even dialectical, its schizo - but that does seem to be the ultimate alternative to dialectics. Sort of a nihilism that also amounts to an "everything is meaningful" approach. So a metadialectics between dialectics and non-dialectics, I guess.
Anyway, the metadialectic seems to be the top administrator/engine of revelation extraction from the text, the means by which the infinite knowledge can be unpacked. Different orders of infinity, perhaps, across texts. Or perhaps varying degrees of transparency of infinity, like this window into infinity/oblivion is less opaque than that one.
Wish I could try my hand at Prynne, seeing the energy circulating in this thread, but thats currently beyond my element. For now I'll just try to absorb what I can from luka and version's findings.