Clinamenic
Binary & Tweed
Not that those are the only two major factors. Financial crisis, lockdown measures, etc.
The academic mystification of social issues, largely as a result of the influence of continental philosophy, I think helped turn social progressivism into more of an upper-middle class project (at times an ostentatious one), and this I think intersected with class resentment due largely to the housing crisis, from what I understand.The high rate of pilling/polarization, in the US, seems attributable to the combo of academic progressivism and Trump. The former helps bring ugly and critical truths to upper-middle class white culture at the cost of mystifying some of these social issues (thanks to continental philosophy jargon), while the latter seems to have been chiefly concerned with exacerbating the tension occasioned by such critical discourse.
Took me what felt like a long time to see that.Very heady things that I, myself, appreciate to a large extent, but stuff that nonetheless registers as gibberish to almost everyone outside the university.
🇺🇲🇺🇲 This a thread for patriots only. 🇺🇲🇺🇲This fucking guy
Stan, let's cut through the admirable equivocating: are you a patriot or aren't yaOn one level, these neuroses can have some utility, insofar as they encourage critical self-reflection about how a person should interact with very different people. But beyond that, it seems liable to get caught in something of a cancerous feedback loop of guilt and self-pity, "I am not really suffering, not compared to them." etc.
I admire this nation, especially its means of government.Stan, let's cut through the admirable equivocating: are you a patriot or aren't ya
I agree I'm with you how can America help the world what's the first stepBut I put planet before nation, ultimately.
I think this is right. I also think the problem is that with the microsocial, it's hard to analyze one situation against others in its "class" of situations—against what's normal. Bias is undoubtedly real and even statistically significant at scale—but in a given interaction, whatever your identity markers are, it's very hard knowing what is exerting causal force, so hard to speculate how someone else with a different complex (intersectional! except on steroids) web of identity markers would've been treated. And because these are matters of offense, the interpretation of the offended party plays an active role in whether the microgesture lands as an offense.And yet, as Fanon described, the psycho-affective dimension of colonialism, or of a post-slavery economy like ours, can be a matter of nuance sometimes, in terms of identifying the problems and whatnot. The constant tension that is fueled by things like microaggressions, etc.
Similar to gender in that respect, it seems, in the sense that the little things really aren't that little, when felt from the inside, from the perspective of the conquered.
i would have stopped being friends with her. this is becasue i have principles.My favorite story that illustrates this when a Barnard friend of mine thought it was a microagression when a Middle-Eastern halal cart guy asked her what country she was from. To me he seemed like a friendly young guy, probably immigrant from his broken English, who was curious about the world and wasn't up with upper-middle class etiquette. She was still fuming about it 15 minutes later, like it ruined her afternoon.
It was my girlfriend's friend so not much optionality—but it did make me question the romantic relationship.i would have stopped being friends with her. this is becasue i have principles.