that's good because soon we will llatfa ssiiihn spllI quite like the non-language
What they've done is a limit on dissonance so people can make a useful image rather than anything troublesome
This is a pretty incredible document. I've not read it all yet but it's like a glossary of every keyword associated with all visual arts that have become standards and matter for whatever reason.judging by the little watermark in the bottom right corner I can see a few people now have access to DALL-E ( I'm not one of them )
this may be of interest to those people
View attachment 12240
A free PDF guide to getting the most out of your prompts
i wonder what the data of all those queries is worth?my opinion is that because openAI own the copyright to any images produced by DALL-E 2, they don't want lawsuits just because some people want to make their own niche special interest pr0n, or to generate images of famous, possibly litigious, people in compromising positions, "deep fakes", hateful images, images in the style of artists whose work is still in copyright who, or their estate, could claim infringement, or anything else that could possibly land the corporation in hot water
edit: TLDR; AI being neutered by lawyers
l-r @pattycakes_ @craner @catalog's dog young @luka @Clinamenic @linebaughMembers of the 'Dissensus' internet forum argue about the relative merits of different strains of UK rave music, in the style of the painter George Shaw
![]()
literally looks nothing like dj hype