Sure, but I think it's clear by now that Israel doesn't give a rat's ass about international public opinion. They don't even care what Americans think of them as long as the military aid keeps coming, and that looks like it's not going to dry up any time soon. Quite the opposite, in fact.right, but october 7th could have reset the dial to a huge extent. instead of taking advantage israel has reverted to what everyone thought was their type. they blundered and gave away pieces for no material gain.
Who are they?You haven't read a single thing droid or padraig have posted in this entire thread, have you? Or you've read them and ignored them, or immediately forgotten.
I dont think that's quite true, actually. it seems that america has managed to moderate the response--holding off a ground invasion until humanitarian aid can be brought to bear on Gaza--and piss off Israeli public opinion, which wonders why its leaders are allowing america to shape its actions at a time of crisis.Sure, but I think it's clear by now that Israel doesn't give a rat's ass about international public opinion. They don't even care what Americans think of them as long as the military aid keeps coming, and that looks like it's not going to dry up any time soon. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Funnily enough, I opened a leveraged long position around the time you posted that, a little below where those dotted lines meet, and now I'm up 537%!lol. Would you like to invest in my crypto scheme? No risk, 1000% profit guaranteed.
Funnily enough, I opened a leveraged long position around the time you posted that, a little below where those dotted lines meet, and now I'm up 537%!
View attachment 16477
Don't worry, I already took profit that more than covers the original collateral, so it's gains from now on.
It's not that exciting, but you do you.
would you prefer that there were no hope of humanitarian assistance? of course not. but that's the situ that would prevail absent international involvement.I suppose, but with four times as many Palestinian civilians dead (so far) as Hamas managed to kill a couple of weeks ago, and hospitals closing for lack of power due to a fuel blockade, it's pretty fucked up that this is the "moderated" response.
what, after all, is preventing he total ethnic cleansing of the gaza strip? it's a combination of international public opinion and the interjections of the "international community" (of states whose opinion israel think matters)
Except 'international involvement' includes billions of US$ in military aid every year since forever, doesn't it? I mean Israel wouldn't exist in the first place if not for 'international involvement'. So it cuts both ways.would you prefer that there were no hope of humanitarian assistance? of course not. but that's the situ that would prevail absent international involvement.
10s of millions of poorly-integrated Muslims in Europe also make it *interesting*. The authorities seem incapable of containing them. It's not the 1950s where they can be bulldozed into the Seine off camera.Israel's nuclear weapons certainly make the situation more ... "interesting"
states dont just disappear on their basis of having or not having aid from the us. yes, international involvement was key to he birth of israel, but its not going to just neatly roll itself up and go away if its us aid is cutExcept 'international involvement' includes billions of US$ in military aid every year since forever, doesn't it? I mean Israel wouldn't exist in the first place if not for 'international involvement'. So it cuts both ways.
No, but it might behave differently if it knew there was a serious possibility of that aid being reduced, or cut off altogether. It may not be acting in the way that the most hard-line members of either the government, the military or the general public would like - which is to say, to give every square metre of Gaza the Tokyo '45 treatment - so yes, in that extremely bare sense, the response has been 'moderated'. But I think it's fair to say Israel has only been able to behave in the way that it has because it's benefited from the USA's apparently unconditional support since the country's inception.states dont just disappear on their basis of having or not having aid from the us. yes, international involvement was key to he birth of israel, but its not going to just neatly roll itself up and go away if its us aid is cut
I think the problem is a bit more prosaic. israel has nukes - what will it take for them to use them? war with iran, where it considers itself to be threatened existential? who is actually in charge of the nukes? Israel is obvs at a point of high pressure in which it's easy to imagine mistakes being made. mistakes are being made, in fact, right now. perhaps this is one explanation for the presence of all of these us air craft carriers in the media - to prevent *israeli* nuclear escalation.But back to nukes, what would the Samson option look like in practice? Would they lob a dozen into Germany for paypack?