Benny Bunter
Well-known member
So why bother use it? Better to kick it into the dust.
Fair enough, but it's still vague and unhelpful. "Differing political opinions"? How do you define it?
But is that anything new?
People like feeling that their worldview is the prevailing worldview, which is a largely abstract sensation which can, to a large extent, be divorced from material reality via simulation.I think the term 'culture war' is substantive, just a bit dramatic if anything. I also think, to a large extent, it is much about vibes as about actual policy. Seems like one of the bigger motivations for the conservative swing in US is the gestalt/abstract feeling that a "way of life" is being eaten away at, in a manner which doesn't cleanly reduce to concrete policy examples.
Same for progressives, just in a different way. Seems like many of the progressives I know are upset not because their material circumstances are gonna be much different under Trump 2.0, but just that it entails a vibeshift they find unpalatable.
I didnt know it was so old tbh, but surely its only come into general use relatively recently.Were any of us claiming it was? The term/concept goes back to at least 1871 according to sufi's Wiki link.
Sorrry, I don't
Understand this type of philosophical writing style,it just goes straight over my head
Thanks. I don't think it's beyond me, but I have a few on board and don't have the patience to get my head round it right nowWe should perhaps have another thread for it, but it's basically saying you have things and you have things which refer to them, e.g. an apple and a picture of an apple. What's being described in the quote is when one of those things doesn't actually refer to anything, e.g. a picture of or word for something which doesn't exist.
Kubernetic Kulture Research UnitWould Mark call it a 'k-war'?
Thanks. I don't think it's beyond me, but I have a few on board and don't have the patience to get my head round it right now
Wrong way round.I might open a Moretti after I finish exercising.