version

Well-known member
The Independent wants you all to know that you're sick and deplorable and it's very disappointed in you.


The disconnect between the media and the public's been glaring on this one.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
The definitions I've encountered haven't focused on quality of life so much as property ownership, i.e. the trend is that the majority increasingly own no property and rely on leases and subscription models from the shrinking number who do.
That's not all there is to capitalism as defined on economics.
 

Corpsey

bandz ahoy
Even dissensus has a CEO you clown.
s-l1200.jpg
 

version

Well-known member
I'm being serious. What does the term encompass for you? No point discussing it if we mean different things.

You're aware I'm not arguing for the existence of late capitalism or neo-feudalism, right? I don't have a particularly strong opinion either way on these things. They're just interesting ideas which may or may not be true.
 

version

Well-known member
Arrighi's three stages of capitalism seemed a fairly compelling model when I encountered it via Jameson:

Arrighi begins with a remark of the great world historian Fernand Braudel: “Every capitalist development of this order seems, by reaching the stage of financial expansion, to have in some sense announced its maturity: it is a sign of autumn.” The yellow leaves of capitalism are apparent when a specific market has been saturated: production slows down, there is no longer any burning need for refrigerators, automobiles, personal computers, there is no expansion possible in the area of production in general; and at that point financial speculation must begin and profits be made in this higher-level or more abstract fashion, capitalism now as it were profiting from itself and speculating on itself, feeding on itself, by way of the stock market and its allied institutions. Arrighi’s insight in fact proposes a three-stage theory of evolution, first a specific market is opened and colonized; then the great moment of production saturates it; and finally, in some third autumnal stage, finance capital sets in and takes over a stagnating economy.​
But this account must be supplemented by a geographical one, in which the emergence of capitalism is mapped and charted by a systematic displacement and enlargement of its centers: from Genoa and the Italian city-states to Spain, from Spain to Holland, Holland to England, and thence ultimately to the United States. Each of these stopping points runs through the entire cycle of the three stages before capital, having exhausted its financial moment, takes flight and moves on to greater possibilities elsewhere. We are now, in the United States, obviously in our financial stage, the stage of speculation of all kinds; and we must, with Arrighi, remain uncertain as to what will follow once that stage is exhausted. (But Chinese production and the immense Chinese market cast a suggestive shadow on the longer future.)​
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
Arrighi's three stages of capitalism seemed a fairly compelling model when I encountered it via Jameson:

Arrighi begins with a remark of the great world historian Fernand Braudel: “Every capitalist development of this order seems, by reaching the stage of financial expansion, to have in some sense announced its maturity: it is a sign of autumn.” The yellow leaves of capitalism are apparent when a specific market has been saturated: production slows down, there is no longer any burning need for refrigerators, automobiles, personal computers, there is no expansion possible in the area of production in general; and at that point financial speculation must begin and profits be made in this higher-level or more abstract fashion, capitalism now as it were profiting from itself and speculating on itself, feeding on itself, by way of the stock market and its allied institutions. Arrighi’s insight in fact proposes a three-stage theory of evolution, first a specific market is opened and colonized; then the great moment of production saturates it; and finally, in some third autumnal stage, finance capital sets in and takes over a stagnating economy.
But this account must be supplemented by a geographical one, in which the emergence of capitalism is mapped and charted by a systematic displacement and enlargement of its centers: from Genoa and the Italian city-states to Spain, from Spain to Holland, Holland to England, and thence ultimately to the United States. Each of these stopping points runs through the entire cycle of the three stages before capital, having exhausted its financial moment, takes flight and moves on to greater possibilities elsewhere. We are now, in the United States, obviously in our financial stage, the stage of speculation of all kinds; and we must, with Arrighi, remain uncertain as to what will follow once that stage is exhausted. (But Chinese production and the immense Chinese market cast a suggestive shadow on the longer future.)​
Speculation exists from the start, and where are the signs of production slowing down. Half of the world isn't even developed and the market is global.
 

version

Well-known member
Arrighi's three stages of capitalism seemed a fairly compelling model when I encountered it via Jameson:

Arrighi begins with a remark of the great world historian Fernand Braudel: “Every capitalist development of this order seems, by reaching the stage of financial expansion, to have in some sense announced its maturity: it is a sign of autumn.” The yellow leaves of capitalism are apparent when a specific market has been saturated: production slows down, there is no longer any burning need for refrigerators, automobiles, personal computers, there is no expansion possible in the area of production in general; and at that point financial speculation must begin and profits be made in this higher-level or more abstract fashion, capitalism now as it were profiting from itself and speculating on itself, feeding on itself, by way of the stock market and its allied institutions. Arrighi’s insight in fact proposes a three-stage theory of evolution, first a specific market is opened and colonized; then the great moment of production saturates it; and finally, in some third autumnal stage, finance capital sets in and takes over a stagnating economy.
But this account must be supplemented by a geographical one, in which the emergence of capitalism is mapped and charted by a systematic displacement and enlargement of its centers: from Genoa and the Italian city-states to Spain, from Spain to Holland, Holland to England, and thence ultimately to the United States. Each of these stopping points runs through the entire cycle of the three stages before capital, having exhausted its financial moment, takes flight and moves on to greater possibilities elsewhere. We are now, in the United States, obviously in our financial stage, the stage of speculation of all kinds; and we must, with Arrighi, remain uncertain as to what will follow once that stage is exhausted. (But Chinese production and the immense Chinese market cast a suggestive shadow on the longer future.)​

One weakness here's that this doesn't take into account markets opened up by new technologies. It isn't over once everyone has a laptop or smartphone, you can then sell them digital products.
 

version

Well-known member
Speculation exists from the start, and where are the signs of production slowing down. Half of the world isn't even developed and the market is global.

Did you not read the second paragraph? That's what it says. The late capitalism thing's explicitly directed at the US in this case. The idea being that the center begins to shift elsewhere once the so-called late/financial stage has been reached.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
Did you not read the second paragraph? That's what it says. The 'late-capitalist' thing's specifically being applied to America in that piece. The idea being the center shifts after it gets to the so-called 'late-stage' and, at the time of writing, it seemed likely to move to China and continue the process.
In what way are things being exhausted rather than just optimised?
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
One weakness here is it doesn't account for digital products. It's not over once everyone has a phone or laptop, you can then sell them software and whatnot.
It's only partly some big conspiracy where people need to sell you stuff to survive. Things that sell sell for a reason; they improve our lives. The biggest companies turn over at a far higher rate than states. There's only so much control they have.

The fact that some things may slow is a result of the accumulation of types of capital like property, know-how, links within the system.
 
Top