mixed_biscuits
_________________________
If anything, bumping off CEOs will increase executive pay as they will need danger money.
I'm being serious. What does the term encompass for you? No point discussing it if we mean different things.Dunno, never heard of it.
The Independent wants you all to know that you're sick and deplorable and it's very disappointed in you.
![]()
Luigi Mangione and the dark truth behind our reaction to arrest of ‘hot assassin’
Yes, internet sleuths helped police track down the suspect in the Brian Thompson case – but the reaction online since then has been less useful than it has salacious, writes Emma Clarkewww.independent.co.uk
That's not all there is to capitalism as defined on economics.The definitions I've encountered haven't focused on quality of life so much as property ownership, i.e. the trend is that the majority increasingly own no property and rely on leases and subscription models from the shrinking number who do.
Even dissensus has a CEO you clown.
I'm being serious. What does the term encompass for you? No point discussing it if we mean different things.
Why did the CEO deserve to die?The disconnect between the media and the public's been glaring on this one. They're really pulling out all the stops to try to make people feel bad about it.
It's actually called late because it's been around for a long time. Late means a long time after the start."Late capitalism" is a far leftist mirage; there is no evidence that capitalism is dying.
Why did the CEO deserve to die?
Cum drunk again. Glug glug glugPoor old biscuits
No, some people call it late because they think it's the end of capitalism, like late antiquity.It's actually called late because it's been around for a long time. Late means a long time after the start.
That's very magnanimous of you.I'm not sure he did. I just don't have much sympathy for him or the media.
Speculation exists from the start, and where are the signs of production slowing down. Half of the world isn't even developed and the market is global.Arrighi's three stages of capitalism seemed a fairly compelling model when I encountered it via Jameson:
Arrighi begins with a remark of the great world historian Fernand Braudel: “Every capitalist development of this order seems, by reaching the stage of financial expansion, to have in some sense announced its maturity: it is a sign of autumn.” The yellow leaves of capitalism are apparent when a specific market has been saturated: production slows down, there is no longer any burning need for refrigerators, automobiles, personal computers, there is no expansion possible in the area of production in general; and at that point financial speculation must begin and profits be made in this higher-level or more abstract fashion, capitalism now as it were profiting from itself and speculating on itself, feeding on itself, by way of the stock market and its allied institutions. Arrighi’s insight in fact proposes a three-stage theory of evolution, first a specific market is opened and colonized; then the great moment of production saturates it; and finally, in some third autumnal stage, finance capital sets in and takes over a stagnating economy.But this account must be supplemented by a geographical one, in which the emergence of capitalism is mapped and charted by a systematic displacement and enlargement of its centers: from Genoa and the Italian city-states to Spain, from Spain to Holland, Holland to England, and thence ultimately to the United States. Each of these stopping points runs through the entire cycle of the three stages before capital, having exhausted its financial moment, takes flight and moves on to greater possibilities elsewhere. We are now, in the United States, obviously in our financial stage, the stage of speculation of all kinds; and we must, with Arrighi, remain uncertain as to what will follow once that stage is exhausted. (But Chinese production and the immense Chinese market cast a suggestive shadow on the longer future.)![]()
A Global Neuromancer - Public Books
Neuromancer is now more than 30 years old, a considerable time to remain a classic. Its publication in the Orwellian year will seem ironic and laden with symbolism only for those who think Orwell has ...www.publicbooks.org
Arrighi's three stages of capitalism seemed a fairly compelling model when I encountered it via Jameson:
Arrighi begins with a remark of the great world historian Fernand Braudel: “Every capitalist development of this order seems, by reaching the stage of financial expansion, to have in some sense announced its maturity: it is a sign of autumn.” The yellow leaves of capitalism are apparent when a specific market has been saturated: production slows down, there is no longer any burning need for refrigerators, automobiles, personal computers, there is no expansion possible in the area of production in general; and at that point financial speculation must begin and profits be made in this higher-level or more abstract fashion, capitalism now as it were profiting from itself and speculating on itself, feeding on itself, by way of the stock market and its allied institutions. Arrighi’s insight in fact proposes a three-stage theory of evolution, first a specific market is opened and colonized; then the great moment of production saturates it; and finally, in some third autumnal stage, finance capital sets in and takes over a stagnating economy.But this account must be supplemented by a geographical one, in which the emergence of capitalism is mapped and charted by a systematic displacement and enlargement of its centers: from Genoa and the Italian city-states to Spain, from Spain to Holland, Holland to England, and thence ultimately to the United States. Each of these stopping points runs through the entire cycle of the three stages before capital, having exhausted its financial moment, takes flight and moves on to greater possibilities elsewhere. We are now, in the United States, obviously in our financial stage, the stage of speculation of all kinds; and we must, with Arrighi, remain uncertain as to what will follow once that stage is exhausted. (But Chinese production and the immense Chinese market cast a suggestive shadow on the longer future.)![]()
A Global Neuromancer - Public Books
Neuromancer is now more than 30 years old, a considerable time to remain a classic. Its publication in the Orwellian year will seem ironic and laden with symbolism only for those who think Orwell has ...www.publicbooks.org
Speculation exists from the start, and where are the signs of production slowing down. Half of the world isn't even developed and the market is global.
In what way are things being exhausted rather than just optimised?Did you not read the second paragraph? That's what it says. The 'late-capitalist' thing's specifically being applied to America in that piece. The idea being the center shifts after it gets to the so-called 'late-stage' and, at the time of writing, it seemed likely to move to China and continue the process.
It's only partly some big conspiracy where people need to sell you stuff to survive. Things that sell sell for a reason; they improve our lives. The biggest companies turn over at a far higher rate than states. There's only so much control they have.One weakness here is it doesn't account for digital products. It's not over once everyone has a phone or laptop, you can then sell them software and whatnot.