version
Well-known member
whichever left wing politician that comes after him will be more interesting as to tracing out capital's restructing of the labour force post-brexit and european re-integration.
Peter Hitchens will be his successor.
whichever left wing politician that comes after him will be more interesting as to tracing out capital's restructing of the labour force post-brexit and european re-integration.
Can any of us say anything about Starmer we haven't learned via the media?
whatever, but not MSM
lol
so you are saying that he is a CREATION?
that we are are witnessing a SPECTACLE?
that DeBord was right?
You could say that about virtually anyone though.I'm saying he's unknowable because everything we can learn about him is via compromised sources.
If by "tweaked" you mean "deliberately falsified", then for the polling orgs that have been consistently accurate in predicting the outcome of elections - YouGov in particular - I don't think so. But which party someone says they're intending to vote for is an easy thing to record, and then after an election we get concrete numbers showing how people actually did vote. Why people voted the way they voted (or the way they intend to vote) is a far more nebulous and complex variable.You trust polling then and don't think it might be tweaked the way you claimed the media might be?
That happened decades ago, under Blair.he already accomplished his tasks before he was elected and then just accelerated. turn the labour party into a party with a middle class voter base and alienate the old union structure.
Makes me ashamed to be a cumbrian.
I'm saying he's unknowable because everything we can learn about him is via compromised sources.
Is this just a brag about how he was super scared of you?how many of us are going to get close to the guy?
in millenium / zoomer parlance I'm an NPC
I once "trained" with a "gang boss" who said to me "if you were in a club then my boys would make sure you wouldn't come within 25 feet of me. no way would you get near me" and that's a gangster ( who you have never heard of, unless you check the TAI CHI UK CHAMPIONSHIP TABLES ) from Manchester, just imagine the levels of security that surround Starmer - of course everything we know about him is mediated by media
Is this just a brag about how he was super scared of you?
You could say that about virtually anyone though.
If by "tweaked" you mean "deliberately falsified", then for the polling orgs that have been consistently accurate in predicting the outcome of elections - YouGov in particular - I don't think so. But which party someone says they're intending to vote for is an easy thing to record, and then after an election we get concrete numbers showing how people actually did vote. Why people voted the way they voted (or the way they intend to vote) is a far more nebulous and complex variable.
That happened decades ago, under Blair.