Corpsey

bandz ahoy
Playing people online is so infuriating when you've been learning against the bot. The bot is always rational (even it's mistakes are rational). Human opponents (at least at my worm level) immediately bring the queen out and start drunken mastering me to death.
 

GhostofKinski

Well-known member
My dream set. Love the berserker biting his shield
Playing people online is so infuriating when you've been learning against the bot. The bot is always rational (even its mistakes are rational). Human opponents (at least at my worm level) immediately bring the queen out and start drunken mastering me to death.
i think that kind of playing is good practice.
Deploying the queen in the development stage, once learned to negate (like the scholars mate) is a huge step. I think you will find it’s going to get easier and easier to just trap the queen by not panicking & continually
Developing. When done thoughtfully your opponent can put you five moves ahead by just threatening/chasing the queen around.

I used to play with this kid who beat me like five times straight. I noticed he relied heavily on his knights. Just for the he’ll of it I tried just exchanging my bishops for his knights.
He never beat me again afterward.
 

line b

Well-known member
I expected Carlsen to be a manosphere guy, getting in trouble for following Jordan Peterson on Facebook and the like
 

version

Well-known member

Corpseyface.

Screenshot-2025-06-05-at-23-04-40-Chess-Page-17-Dissensus.png
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________

Game-playing feeds into the gameplaying manospherical social climbing and pick-up artists; being competitive about a game also gives a stamp of approval to Jordan Peterson's generalisations on human society, and zero sum games are hierarchical and a training ground for a hard right outlook.
 

luka

Well-known member
Game-playing feeds into the gameplaying manospherical social climbing and pick-up artists; being competitive about a game also gives a stamp of approval to Jordan Peterson's generalisations on human society, and zero sum games are hierarchical and a training ground for a hard right outlook.
Biscuits claims 'i was radicalised by table football'
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
I'm also not comfortable with the patriarchal command structure. Pretending that the queen's "power" provides some sort of gender balance is disingenuous, for how is this "power" demonstrated other than in having to do the most work.
 

Corpsey

bandz ahoy
Historian Marilyn Yalom proposes several factors that might have been partly responsible for influencing the piece towards its identity as a queen and its power in modern chess: the prominence of medieval queens such as Eleanor of Aquitaine, Blanche of Castile, and more particularly Isabella I of Castile; the cult of the Virgin Mary;[4] the power ascribed to women in the troubadour tradition of courtly love; and the medieval popularity of chess as a game particularly suitable for women to play on equal terms with men.[9] She points to medieval poetry depicting the Virgin as the chess-queen of God or Fierce Dieu.[10]
 

GhostofKinski

Well-known member
In
Historian Marilyn Yalom proposes several factors that might have been partly responsible for influencing the piece towards its identity as a queen and its power in modern chess: the prominence of medieval queens such as Eleanor of Aquitaine, Blanche of Castile, and more particularly Isabella I of Castile; the cult of the Virgin Mary;[4] the power ascribed to women in the troubadour tradition of courtly love; and the medieval popularity of chess as a game particularly suitable for women to play on equal terms with men.[9] She points to medieval poetry depicting the Virgin as the chess-queen of God or Fierce Dieu.[10]
In the U.S. Army the infantry, including Airborne/Rangers are known as the Queen of Battle. Artillery is the King. I always kind of figured that was a chess analogy from Napoleonic times.
The game is of course much older.
Napoleon started and was renowned as a master of using Artillery.
 
Top