luka
Well-known member
"But the human agent once on the scene, immediately introduces his own impalpable forces. I BREAK THE TREE depends for its kinematics on our beleif in the 'I' as a source of the necessary energies, in the pitch and contour of his actions. The agent must be grounded in some credible forcefulness, so fixed down and planted that his exertions can have direction outward and away from himself.,,, What makes the difference then, so articulates the sentence that it may move with purpose and effect along its own line, outward from the agent, the object, the lungs? it's continued momentum, it seems to me, past and round and athwart changes in course and direction, and the credible certainty of its starting point. The two depend inseperably on upon the other. The movement founds the origin and the origin impels the movement: equal and opposite reaction perhaps..
And if it needs no question how the rocks on the shore may allow us to push on them to start out to sea, how is the human agent so endowed, with the right to function as the noun (pro-noun) subject of the sentece (his own life)? "
And if it needs no question how the rocks on the shore may allow us to push on them to start out to sea, how is the human agent so endowed, with the right to function as the noun (pro-noun) subject of the sentece (his own life)? "