But by taking up the theme of waking, wakefulness and the flux of its attendant precepts through the course of a day, (‘in the life’), Brass takes on implicitly the claims to inclusion made by the two great counter-epical literary monuments of the standard modernist canon in English, Joyce’s Ulysses and Eliot’s Waste Land, and glances proleptically towards the mausoleum of both, Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow (1973). For Brass takes ‘place’ loosely over the course of a day only in order to confute the anomie and religiosity of Eliot, and the ambiguous reconciliations of Molly and Leopold with the more stellified arrangements of Pie and Outwash in the book’s closing poem, Of Sanguine Fire.one for Limburger http://jacketmagazine.com/24/nolan.html
"The Kirghiz Disasters dramatises this process of silencing at some length by re-enacting a particular process, the historical destruction of the Kirghizian language not once but twice. A disaster is ‘star damage’ but no longer ‘at home’, since the life-world of the C20th has become the world proposed by Heraclitus as its opposite, the anticthonic ‘counter earth’. These images are displayed earlier in the book, but with the concrete example of the Kirghiz people, the destruction of earth resides precisely in that loss of collective narrative which can explain what ‘native soil’ actually means. Thus the poem proceeds as a mangled bulletin, intercutting ‘news from the Tarim Basin’ with domestic trivia from the home front.
The epic tales (Albert Lord’s ‘return songs’) of the Kirghizians now survive in only mangled form, the rubble of medieval and later Soviet purgations and enforced migrations. In the wasteland aftermath of Thomas Pynchon’s post-war reconstruction zone, the ‘Kirghiz light’ is an emblem of visionary absence, everything that cannot any longer be viewed or comprehended within the constraints of contemporary political domination, as the landscape is cleared for its reconstituted inheritors, IG Farben and ICI. Here Prynne’s contrast with Pynchon is especially striking. Both Gravity’s Rainbow and Brass make intermittent use of the angelology of Rilke as an ulterior guideline through the wastes, though Prynne’s text, counterposing revelation with millennium in ways that Pynchon merely confuses, takes on a wider range of spirit-doubles and his moments of self-parody are freed of the whimsical topicality of the novel. And just as ‘the darker fields’ of Into the Day, deliberately summon the last cadences of Lycidas in order to banish them, the mock-apocalypse at the close of Brass deliberately leaves open the question of how any purely ‘visionary’ process can wage itself against the evasions diagnosed by The Ideal Star Fighter. Are these swerves all part of the same psychic economy, two faces of the same coin flipped by Melville’s disappearing trickster at the close of his Confidence Man."
this is an early one and a lot more approachable.
![]()
J.H. Prynne – The Holy City
Come up to it, as you stand there / that the wind is quite warm on the sides / of the face. That is so, felt / as a matter of practice, or / not to agree. And the span, / to walkgenius.com
Come up to it, as you stand there
that the wind is quite warm on the sides
of the face. That is so, felt...
etc.
this is an early one and a lot more approachable.
![]()
J.H. Prynne – The Holy City
Come up to it, as you stand there / that the wind is quite warm on the sides / of the face. That is so, felt / as a matter of practice, or / not to agree. And the span, / to walkgenius.com
Come up to it, as you stand there
that the wind is quite warm on the sides
of the face. That is so, felt
as a matter of practice, or
not to agree. And the span,
to walk over the rough grass-all of this
is that we do, quite within acceptance
and not to press
the warm alarm
but a light
surface, a day
lifted from high
thich roots, upwards
Where we go is a loved side of the temple,
a place for repose, a concrete path.
There's no mystic movement involved: just
that we are
is how, each
severally we're
carried into
I had to read and reread a lot before I got to enjoy his writing.With Eliot there's obviously a lot of difficulty but the beauty of some lines, and the disturbing quality of some lines, hooks me in and so I feel like it's actually worth the effort to screw up my forehead and try harder.
The way that the first part of Four Quartets doesn't mean much or anything,
The first part of Burnt Norton is a string of invisibilities, unknowings, emptinesses, non-happenings. The surface glittered out of the heart of light
Paste.the increase of a surplus population in the UK in light of students becoming more & more burdened with debt (Prynne actually read parts of this at the Cambridge Occupation) means their inclusion as fodder within the capitalist system- their employment by the state to be unemployed. & with the riots last summer this is even more so the case. a massive army of people that are tired of being treated as if they aren't human. tired of being treated like they're not there when they clearly are.