if you have been reading me for 20 years and still dont understand where im coming from no amount of explaining is going to solve that is itThis is just both-sidising it. Let's you state what you think - or what's entertaining for you to think - without ownership
so i present it partly to be looked at as a thing in the world with growing power and partly as a frame to interpret world events through and to see what it clarifies and what it distorts
That just means you can't be bothered to construct am argument against it. Not exciting enough.i think this is quite a silly argument. you wouldnt be able to carry it through with any conviction if you attempted to.
is that what Jews do?One of the most tried and tested of these is "the stab in the back".
"The meaning of a communication is the response it elicits"if you have been reading me for 20 years and still dont understand where im coming from no amount of explaining is going to solve that is it
the problem i have with the invocation of detail is that it makes any simplification at all impermissible and the world is exploded into ever more granular chaos, just bits of shrapnel flying everywhere
And there we have it, the first slide to abuse because someone disagrees with you.yes, and it elicits all sorts of responses. the responses differ depnding on the level of reading comprehension and basic intelligence.
oh fuck off danny you know youre thick.And there we have it, the first slide to abuse because someone disagrees with you.
Like I said, the disavowal of responsibility.so please dont try and draw me into 'debate'. youve completely misunderstood where im coming from.