i had a look at his paintings after seeing this thread.
Some good stuff definitely, but i can also see why no-one has heard of him as an artist.
Cos it's basically very similar to a lot of other stuff from the time that's a bit better.
bit vorticist but not as much precision as lewis? nice figures but nowhere as interesting as spencer? his trees are good but maybe not as good as eg paul nash?
the watercolours are where it's at with him but they are pesky when reproduced... i love watercolours if you can see em in a gallery cos you see the shining and all the different tones, but doesn't tend to work so well on a screen. would love to see this in the original, bet the colours are amazing
his wartime sketches are also really good
good heads up
@jenks - will check him out if i see he's in a gallery anywhere.
can't comment on the poetry, i struggle reading poetry.