The Feminine Perspective against the Manosphere
- Thread starter ?!..!?
- Start date
-
- Tags
- a bunch of trolls trolling each other aesthetic jihad chicks dig guys with money cia lesbian david lesbian do you tongue punch the dirt star? dolezal1977 eating pussy without asking everyone on this board is a troll extraterrestrial bisexual feminist travis bickle justified ancients of noncing lesbian separatism luka's crop top malelesbian: english rp boy toy malethespian mansplaining feminism mr tea confirmed pegging freak mrs tea eaten out 24/7 prevent prevent! sarlacc pit taking the filth the art of trolling the feminonce massive the perils of self-publishing the viper of cunnilingus undisciplined lockerroom pussy eating unimaginable anguish version's throbbing penis
What were those suggestions? I must have missed them.
ghost
Well-known member
Yes, I am. I have decided that the word "feminine" refers to somebody that owns at least three sheep. If you'd like to describe something else, that's okay, you should simply use a different word.
Yes, I suppose you must have...
Murphy
cat malogen
how would you address your position in the event you were bought many many drinks @malelesbian , something akin to
Hmm, I'm starting to think you don't know what these suggestions are either...
Listen, if there's one thing I know, it's that, if a guy is telling you directly "I'm not a reductionist" and you still argue he's a reductionist, then you're attacking a straw man. Please no strawman arguments. Do any of you who believe I'm a reductionist actually have an argument for why a non-reductive version of my view would fail?
I'd say that's a correct characterization of incels, but I'm trying to use love to reach incels. I promote feminine culture, a feminist alternative to incel culture. My question is, how do we get incels to re-direct their pain to turn it against the patriarchy?
shiels
_
I think you’re right that it essentially comes down to the need for love, like everything does. And PUA / manosphere etc tries to train individuals to win it through techniques and provides a false sense of community … a proper community might provide opportunities for love beyond validation through sex/ Romance
shiels
_
Part of the problem in your current conception might the conflation of power or patriarchy with quite crass gender binaries. If you start on false binaries you’re on shaky ground to analyse the problem
The patriarchy is masculine culture, I don't see why anyone would deny that. I'm just reccomending that men represent an alternative to mainstream culture. What's the correct binary we should start on??
Also I agree that we should build communities that spread love. But where's the love or community in turning everything into a debate, to the point where you deny that male feminity can even help fight masculine individualism? Feminine culture is the culture of the community, that's why redpillers try to make everything about the individual, why they have a false community. They benefit from weakening communal bonds.
