The Feminine Perspective against the Manosphere
- Thread starter ?!..!?
- Start date
-
- Tags
- a bunch of trolls trolling each other aesthetic jihad chicks dig guys with money cia lesbian david lesbian do you tongue punch the dirt star? dolezal1977 eating pussy without asking everyone on this board is a troll extraterrestrial bisexual feminist travis bickle justified ancients of noncing lesbian separatism luka's crop top malelesbian: english rp boy toy malethespian mansplaining feminism mr tea confirmed pegging freak mrs tea eaten out 24/7 prevent prevent! sarlacc pit taking the filth the art of trolling the feminonce massive the perils of self-publishing the viper of cunnilingus undisciplined lockerroom pussy eating unimaginable anguish version's throbbing penis
line b
Well-known member
I meant this half seriously if for no other reason than media saturation. there could be a more banal, quotidian manefestion of politics now than then. More normal and functioning people whose entire inner worlds revolve around it. Obv the 60s had that too but maybe less of these people? Every third grocery clerk now has the rigor and passion of the student activist. There also seems to be a pride now in 'having a take' where perhaps in the 60s polite society still considered political talk indecent. This is all a hunch though
Brett pulled his tank top up over his head and stared at himself in the full-length mirror. He pushed down his jeans, then his boxers, and imagined the moment when Jennifer saw him nude for the first time. His feet were average-sized, and there was hair on his toes that he should probably take care of before tonight. He liked his legs just fine, but his thighs were wide and embarrassingly muscular. He tried standing at an angle, a twist at his waist. Some improvement. In that position, it was easier to see his ass and notice that it was not as pert as it had been at 22. He clenched both cheeks, hoping that tightened its look. He sucked in his tummy and pulled his pecs up high, trying to present them like pastries in a bakery window. Would she like him? Were the goods good enough? He pouted his lips and ran his hands over his thighs, masking their expanse. Maybe.
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
I'd read the hell out of that.
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
"Source: Gus's novel"
So satisfying to see a woman put so eloquently what nearly all of you failed to understand for years on end. It was never about reductionism, never about femdom, never about fetishes, never about essentialism, never about stereotypes. This post wonderfully expresses a truth central to male lesbianism/femboy feminism. I hope you'll all read her post carefully. And to think, you all claimed I didn't know about real women when MALE LESBIANISM WAS CREATED TO RESPOND TO DESIRES EXPRESSED BY REAL WOMEN.
Who knows, maybe one day you'll all learn. =D
version
Well-known member
"We were talking the other day about how he’s the only straight guy I vibed with and how it’s funny because he is far from following the rules of patriarchal heteronormative gender roles."
Why is that 'funny'? Makes complete sense that the only straight guy she would "vibe with" would be the one who behaves the least like a straight guy, given the way she's discussing this stuff.
Why is that 'funny'? Makes complete sense that the only straight guy she would "vibe with" would be the one who behaves the least like a straight guy, given the way she's discussing this stuff.
It's "funny" because most people don't even know straight femboys exist. But, you're making much ado about a trivial linguistic quibble, as usual. Why does it matter if it's "funny"? It certainly is unusual to you, since you claim feminine men act "the least like straight" men. You should have listened to the wisdom of femboy feminism! After all, I've always claimed both cishet femboys and trads act equally "like straight" men.
But she didn't go for a patriarchal trad that's the point. Maybe she did in the past, but she just made a post praising her femboyfriend. And yes, many people do find it unusual that straight femboys exist at all. That is because the patriarchy represses feminine culture, a point I have repeatedly made which everyone else ignored like they always do. But I do agree with you that many women who normally go for trads would prefer femboys if they knew femboys were an option or knew what it was like to date one!
Appearance is not a good way to judge whether or not someone promotes and contributes to feminine culture. You're right: plenty of feminine looking men perform all sorts of bad masculine behaviors, that's true just like plenty of trad women perform bad masculine behaviors. I myself look only slightly more flamboyant that the average straight man, but what matters is that I actively affirm and contribute to feminine culture. Don't be so superficial. Look at you judging men entirely off their fashion choices, look at your toxic femininity. Everyone on this board does Mean Girl Regina George type politicking constantly. She specifically said the guys is sensitive and promotes non-toxic masculinity.
line b
Well-known member
She spends more time talking about his crop top and joining burlesque than she does his sensitivites. His sensitivities are given a quick aside truncated with an 'also.'
That twitter post has a truth I don't see much mentioned "I know that a lot of women pursue and prefer men who embody the truncated human expression of compliance with restrictive gender roles." - women are just as responsible for "patriarchy"/"toxic masculinity" by enforcing this through sexual selection - then again, if women are the people enforcing it, what does that mean?
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Sexual selection commonsensically prioritises partners with more of the skills you don't have yourself so that the partnership is overall more able. This is how biological sex differentiation evolved in the first place: specialisation enabled by the sex differentiation that also compensates for it.
version
Well-known member
The talk of balance doesn't ring true to me as these discussions often seem to go one way: men "getting in touch with their feminine side." That isn't balance. That's pulling everything in one direction. Are women who get into combat sports and other traditionally masculine activities somehow reduced by it?
I had a look through that person's other Insta posts and it's all infographics of their own pronouncements and they talk about their partner like they're talking about an employee.
I had a look through that person's other Insta posts and it's all infographics of their own pronouncements and they talk about their partner like they're talking about an employee.