You know what makes A LOT of sense? Butler's ideas. Because they're almost all empirical.Oh dear
You know what makes A LOT of sense? Butler's ideas. Because they're almost all empirical.Oh dear
This is the 'nugget in shit' argument, is it?You know what makes A LOT of sense? Butler's ideas. Because they're almost all empirical.
I don't want to take too firm a stance here but Wikipedia says in the intro that NVLD's diagnostic criteri are inconsistent, which is the closest they get to saying something is fake.
You're a zeroSince you have an MA in Continental Philosophy (most universities do not offer an MA in Continental Philosophy, so your claim is highly suspect) why don't you tell us what your area of expertise was? How about your favorite continental philosophers? Can you summarize any of their ideas?
Not everything empirical is clear. That's a central point of continental philosophy.This is the 'nugget in shit' argument, is it?
If they're intrinsically clear and empirical then why aren't they expressed clearly and logically?
Atleast I can answer those same questions I asked you about continental philosophy!You're a zero
Could you stop grandstanding about continental philosophy, it's embarrassingNot everything empirical is clear. That's a central point of continental philosophy.
It's more embarrassing to see you regurgitate the worst elements of analytic philosophy while lying about your knowledge of the continentals!Could you stop grandstanding about continental philosophy, it's embarrassing
very sillyIt's more embarrassing to see you regurgitate the worst elements of analytic philosophy while lying about your knowledge of the continentals!
which thesis? they have many.Just do the simple task of pointing to a stepwise summary of Butler's thesis
Whichever, fill your bootswhich thesis? they have many.
That's far too spare, isn't itHere's a simple summary of one of Butler's arguments:
(1) Actions define gender.
(2) Therefore, gender is non-essential.
No. I thought you wanted a simple, clear summary. Now you have one.That's far too spare, isn't it
Yes, but it has to be logically compelling otherwise it's not persuasive.No. I thought you wanted a simple, clear summary. Now you have one.