mixed_biscuits
_________________________
You're denser than all of the matter in the universe crammed into a woodlouse's anus.mate, you're completely thick.
Try washing that out.
You're denser than all of the matter in the universe crammed into a woodlouse's anus.mate, you're completely thick.
You're denser than all of the matter in the universe crammed into a woodlouse's anus.
Try washing that out.
I don't know why you're so angry, because I do believe in the existence of souls, not that you give any rationale for your assertions.no use your brain for once. free will is a contradiction in terms as a philosophical problem. It only makes sense if you believe in the existence of souls. I can't believe I'm having to explain this to you.
What's your evidence for this picture?"will" as a concept has become in its elaboration alien from action and actor. people who think "will" and not determination are always stuck trying to screw up their courage, assert themselves against nature 'like a kingdom within a kingdom'. i believe (besides science-philosophy) in gradations, mutual embedding of "Worlds and Souls" with the caveat that there is no first or final World or Soul neatly separable, set above or against Worlding and Ensoulment. the soul - a small world - is growing all the time
I don't know why you're so angry, because I do believe in the existence of souls, not that you give any rationale for your assertions.
People who believe in souls create civilizations, people who do not have built nothing but hell on earth.
I've not been keeping up, but did not MB confirm he believes in both?
Not necessarily, you don't need a religious affiliation to believe with your whole heart that there is an order that stands outside of time that guides the progress of the cosmos as time progresses. I think Bohm called it the pilot wave, or Rta/satya in the Vedic texts, Logos in classical thinking, or Gnon. And of course your can have free will within such a determined framework because the influence of human will is necessarily limited compared to the overarching principes, and either concordant or discordant with it.