comparison with global warming does not work
w/r/t global warming - the only difference is you agree with the one & are "skeptical" about the other. you've already admitted you know next to nothing about AIDS & I doubt you know much more about global warming or the fake scientific "debates" around either. the M.O. is almost exactly the same, the major difference being that climate change skeptics have been much more successful.
anyway, by all means prove me wrong - cite some more sources,
anything besides that one video clip. but you won't be able to; there's guys in the S.A. govt hip pocket like Duesburg & Rasnick, both of whom were on Thabo Mbeki's AIDS "advisory panel". Rasnick is also all tied up with the ultra-dodgy & ultra-crazy Rath Foundation (Matthias Rath is a snake oil salesman if ever there was one). and Kary Mullis*, who is f**king crazy whatever his views on AIDS are (see below, you'd love this dude). that's really it, as far as scientists. after that you get into the virulent homophobia of Henry Bauer (denialism appeals to a certain strain of conservatives for obvious reasons), the sheer craziness of Celia Farber & of course the prematurely dead like Christine Maggiore. that's your team.
*claims that PCR, for which he won a Nobel, came to him in an LSD hallucination. he also claims to have had a close encounter with fluorescent raccoon aliens - no, I'm not making that up (fits in well with the whole masonic lizard people thing tho). oh and to make it even more perfect he's also a climate change skeptic.
the possibility that general health and nutrition MAY be more important than drugs for patients??? fairly shocking stuff don't you think?
dude didn't rank anything by importance. he said that there was perhaps too much of a focus on drugs to detriment of other (cheaper, easier to implement) methods of prevention & preventative treatment, which seems like a valid question at least. he didn't say a single bad thing about antiretrovirals, a single thing about conspiracies, nothing to suggest that HIV doesn't cause AIDS or that the AIDS situation in Africa is inflated. he made some ambiguous comments about the ability of people with strengthened immune systems to "fight off infections". & no, there's nothing shocking about the idea that nutrition is important, unless you're fairly clueless about AIDS.
this is what you always do; fixate on one guy (Bernal, Diamond etc.) - or in this case one video clip - & refuse to acknowledge anything else. I'm going to assume you didn't watch Montagnier's Nobel lecture I linked where he, among other things, directly refutes AIDS denialism.