I think, to her, "conspiracy theorising" is predominantly the territory of the right wing crank. You can point to kernels of truth within some of their theories, but, if there's any truth to them, there's likely a left wing explanation that focuses on systems and institutions rather than Satanic cabals or "The Jews".
In a recent interview she stressed the importance of rigorous systems analysis to offer an alternative to the people in danger of falling down those rabbit holes. A similar argument to the one made by The Invisible Committee in Conspiracist Manifesto about not ceding the territory to the right:
Freud called delusions an attempt at a cure; they initiate the process of making sense of experiences that cannot be processed otherwise. Nobody chooses to be delusional—something to keep in mind when interacting with proletarians who might resort to conspiracy theories to explain their motives for opposing the ruling class. That’s not to say that delusions can’t be wrong or incredibly harmful; the point is to develop a new analytic method of listening and working with these beliefs rather than positioning oneself a priori against them. Perhaps one shortcoming of the Conspiracist Manifesto is that it neglects to formulate such an analytic method—something that would work to counter the obvious fact of identification and belief and lend conspiratorial thinking an ever more exact articulation, preventing a total break with reality.
... although I've made my misgivings about their particular strategy known in another thread as their intention seems to be to use those beliefs rather than dismantle them.