Given what they did to Frank Olson and others, it wouldn't surprise me if this were all, or mostly, true.If this is true then it's horrifying, and if it isn't true then this woman is horrifyingly mentally ill. Either way, a very sad story.
![]()
MKULTRA's Terminal Experiments
5248-word essay on an especially covered-up part of Project MKULTRA, the CIA's mind-control program which existed from 1953 to 1973.taolin.substack.com
Did you actually read any of this beyond the headline?Peter Power, one time high ranking employee of Scotland Yard and member of its Anti-Terrorist Branch, reported in two major UK media outlets that his company Visor Consulting had on the morning of 7th of July been conducting 'crisis exercises' whose scenarios uncannily mirrored those of the actual attack on 7/7/2005 in London . Very dodgy!
Coincidence of bomb exercises?
Before the discovery of the London bombers' identities, bloggers had been speculating about a large-scale bomb-simulation that took place at the same time and locations as the explosions.www.channel4.com
In the frenzy of linking, cross linking and careless speculation, however, it appears most self-publishers - and Al Jazeera - failed to contact Visor to corroborate their claims. In fact, the 'exercises' he spoke of on Five Live were carried out purely 'on paper', or at least PowerPoint, by a small group of seven or eight executives (Power remains tight-lipped about the client) seeking to examine the impact on corporate decision-making of a potential crisis situation. As Fintan Dunne, editor of BreakForNews.com points out, 'these types of private-sector "risk management" drills never use field staff.
Neither do [such] low-level corporate drills have active involvement of police or other security forces.' The exercise, therefore, was 'in no way comparable to U.S. drills and wargames on 9/11 - which were being run by active-duty security forces in the U.S. military, federal agencies, the FAA and various emergency services.'
As Power explained, the London bombing scenario was in fact one of three explored: another looked at the disruption that might be caused by unruly anti-globalisation demonstrators. In no case was there any real mobilisation of physical or human resources, which makes the case for 'planned' intelligence alibi look awfully flimsy, if not downright silly.
In the light of a brief interview with Power, the 'unbelievable' coincidence of events suddenly seems entirely comprehensible: the train stations targeted, after all, were all in central London -- any planner would pick these amongst a list of possible targets.
Indeed, in developing the London bombing scenario used in this exercise, Power's consultancy drew on the sort of scenario already explored in Osiris 2, a much-publicised major exercise initiated in the City of London to simulate a poison gas attack on the underground. Power further utilised his experience of taking part in Panorama's programme 'London Under Attack', another timely simulation.
And the date? That is indeed coincidence -- but an unbelievable one? 'Every week across the UK there are probably about hundred exercises, tests and simulations going on to get crisis teams familiar with their roles,' Power insists. 'We certainly do this regularly for many clients, the vast majority of them paper-based.'
Given this, the likelihood that one such simulation should fall on the day of an actual disaster is relatively high.
might delete this soon
also forgot to mention that my grandmother (mom's side) ended up committing suicide
the 2005 emergency planning exercise ... mirrored the July 7 London bombings too closely for comfort - all the locations matched (many citations seem to have disappeared)Did you actually read any of this beyond the headline?
Well what are you saying exactly? That it was some kind of false flag?thw "2005 emergency planning exercise ... mirrored the July 7 London bombings too closely for comfort." - nearly all the locations matched iirc (trying to find a citation)
i've updated the post (i know the citation on the link is Alex Jones - trying to find a better one ) - it may be coincidence.Well what are you saying exactly? That it was some kind of false flag?
People who lost family members in the bombings got stalked/hounded by nutters convinced their dead relatives were 'crisis actors' who were still alive somewhere. Just like what happened in the US when Alex Jones made similar claims about the Sandy Hook massacre.
What do you think the odds of that coincidence are?i've updated the post (i know the citation on the link is Alex Jones - trying to find a better one ) - it may be coincidence.
the exercises probably couldn't be held at major terminals. the odds of the coincidence are low imoWhat do you think the odds of that coincidence are?
Did you miss the bit in the article where it said the exercises were carried out in an office, using a computer and bits of paper?the exercises probably couldn't be held at major terminals. the odds of the coincidence are low imo
Hard to see why it would be a false flag though, the whole episode reflected very poorly on Blair and multiculturalism in general.
where / in which article?Did you miss the bit in the article where it said the exercises were carried out in an office, using a computer and bits of paper?
The apparatus of the security state multiplied several times over after the attacks, so there's a motivation, but on this occasion, they did seem to be genuine homegrown terrorists. It wouldn't be beyond the security services to let things play out to their "benefit", that seems to happen. To keep tabs on all the various cells about to do things and maybe allow a specific action to run its course would be a viable MO. Sinister, but they're not beyond using agents provocateurs to discredit protestors, it's just a more developed version of that.I don't think it was a false flag, but a false flag doesn't necessarily have to come from the top.