mms; what is the polar opposite of
being "attracted more to the idea of him trying to get people's backs up, rather than agreeing with him on the actual contents of the article" ?
i'm actually confused, not trying to be a wind up..... , your into the idea of people winding reynolds up??
--
agree with ben, what does hating on hyph have to do with 16-bit?
disliking wobble goes beyond what it sounds like, as soon as shit head wobble djs turn up at fwd / run the show at a night like rinse@matter i ,without fail , get a call from my girlfriend saying that she got hassled all night by sweaty pricks.... its like a scumbag magnet , that sort of music.
reynolds says "maximalist direction in post-wobble is the way to go i think... " but on what f'ing basis does he say this? ? ? does he just sit in a chair spazzing out to 16bit?? he is so obviously playing devil's advocate, in a really lame, predictable manner....... i would just love to superglue him to the middle of a packed club with 16 bit , n type , raffertie etc all playing out.... cos im sure he'd jizz himself over the ludic-ness of it all, ohhh shit music,. i mean please. , its not LIQUID VS JUMP UP or hardcore vs detroit.... squarepusher vs jungle..... etc etc etc
hyph is a rhythmic dane-able tune, chainsaw is a retarded sludge fest , no groove, no nothing, its not even very "extreme" or "maximal" in regard to its modulation / lfo usage, somthing like guttermusic VIP is way more maximal....
nb: and he says "Wobble horror" is like wobble's windowlicker, but i thought idm/experimentalism was ich dont think so??? don't follow his logic at all.