Not a value statement, but I think what you're saying Jimi was more true 12 months ago than it is now. There's much less talk of funky and post-dubstep merging than there used to be.
By and large, non-funky-listeners aren't even interested in "funkstep" now that "uk house" (or "uk bass", or etc) is a full-fledged scene of its own - even the profiles of Roska and Scratcha DVA (and Lil' Silva for that matter) have basically gone down rather than up over the past year, as more non-funky producers fill in the gap between post-dubstep and house.
I think the interest of Brit post-dubstep audiences in funky was pretty much situational in the first place: people were ready for a percussive syncopated house sound, (post)dubstep itself was providing that only fitfully, so listeners and DJs had to engage with funky even if it wasn't really their ideal music. But that engagement was only ever going to last for as long as there wasn't much other stuff with more obvious "uk bass" sonic values that could perform the same role or function.
As per 2-step splitting into dubstep (which gradually became less and less identifiable with 2-step, both stylistically and in terms of personnel) and grime, uk funky may well change into something else but it won't be uk bass or some kind of hybrid of the two.
Currently my biggest concern about funky is actually the opposite, if anything: the progressive rise of pretty arid sounding tribal tunes that basically sound like a Luciano set circa 2008. Funky isn't in danger of losing its identity but might grow a bit boring nonetheless...
By and large, non-funky-listeners aren't even interested in "funkstep" now that "uk house" (or "uk bass", or etc) is a full-fledged scene of its own - even the profiles of Roska and Scratcha DVA (and Lil' Silva for that matter) have basically gone down rather than up over the past year, as more non-funky producers fill in the gap between post-dubstep and house.
I think the interest of Brit post-dubstep audiences in funky was pretty much situational in the first place: people were ready for a percussive syncopated house sound, (post)dubstep itself was providing that only fitfully, so listeners and DJs had to engage with funky even if it wasn't really their ideal music. But that engagement was only ever going to last for as long as there wasn't much other stuff with more obvious "uk bass" sonic values that could perform the same role or function.
As per 2-step splitting into dubstep (which gradually became less and less identifiable with 2-step, both stylistically and in terms of personnel) and grime, uk funky may well change into something else but it won't be uk bass or some kind of hybrid of the two.
Currently my biggest concern about funky is actually the opposite, if anything: the progressive rise of pretty arid sounding tribal tunes that basically sound like a Luciano set circa 2008. Funky isn't in danger of losing its identity but might grow a bit boring nonetheless...