Iranian democracy

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
I never know for certain if you're deadpanning it josef.

So, who is willing to make some predictions?

if there is a widespread general strike it's going to be real trouble for the regime.

Mousavi personally is walking a razor's edge. he won't be able to pull that off forever.

Obama will be forced to come out (on Sunday night maybe? or Monday) & make some kind of statement.

the longer this goes on the better the chance that some nervous Basij kid w/twitchy trigger finger will touch off a spark beyond anyone's control.

serious repercussions of some kind of Hizballah, Hamas, & I guess Syria. among others.

not sure of any of these except the last one & only cos it's so vague.
 

josef k.

Dangerous Mystagogue
I never know for certain if you're deadpanning it josef.

I've never sure myself.

I think:

1) The fact that today doesn't seem to have a massacre may embolden the protesters further.

2) A lot of arrests are being made in Tehran tonight.

3) The regime has already lost a great deal of legitimacy.

4) Can Khamenei back track? I doubt it.

5) Cohen says that the police are wavering.

6) Arresting or killing Moussavi may widen splits and incite more rage.

7) The protesters are outgunned. They cannot take the State by force. It comes to force, the state will prevail, badly weakened.

8) How many people is the State willing to kill? Can they realistically crush this movement by force, with the State still surviving intact?
 

vimothy

yurp
It's very interesting to think of this from the perspective of the regime. They are trying to prevent a large mass of protesters gathering to challenge the security forces. But too much force will be a failure for the regime, who will lose legitimacy as a result when lack of legitimacy is plainly the cause of its problems.
 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
well your predictions are better I reckon

4) Can Khamenei back track? I doubt it.

nah he can't, he really backed himself into a corner w/that speech yesterday. before that he had some freedom to maneuver but now any concessions are akin to admitting defeat (& weakness).

7) The protesters are outgunned. They cannot take the State by force. It comes to force, the state will prevail, badly weakened.

8) How many people is the State willing to kill? Can they realistically crush this movement by force, with the State still surviving intact?

if it stands as it is now then yeah I think you're pretty spot on - the regime could crush this by force but only a serious cost. really depends if the police & especially the army refuses to shoot &/or comes over. that's who these things usually get decided - that's what did it in '79 yeah?

one thing I'd like to know, & which I haven't heard anything about - aside from Twitter rumors - is where the regular army stands. what is its relationship w/the IRGC like? w/Iranian society? has anyone heard what Ataollah Salehi's been up to?
 

vimothy

yurp
The regime wins if everyone goes home. All (he says!) the protesters need to do is keep protesting. It's not a question of defeating the security forces.

And the longer this goes on for, the greater the stakes for the regime, because the confrontation is forcing Mousavi into conflict with Khamenei, not merely AN. So by escalating, the regime is creating an existential constitutional crisis for itself instead of containing it within the framework of the presidential vote (surely its purpose).
 

josef k.

Dangerous Mystagogue
The regime wins if everyone goes home. All (he says!) the protesters need to do is keep protesting.

The protesters need to retain a large-enough critical mass (they need to keep increasing in intensity, if not in numbers) in order to keep protesting. They need to keep the narrative moving. Stasis is death.
 

josef k.

Dangerous Mystagogue
nah he can't, he really backed himself into a corner w/that speech yesterday. before that he had some freedom to maneuver but now any concessions are akin to admitting defeat (& weakness).

If this is true, then the protesters can only succeed by effecting a drastic curtailment of his power, if not his replacement. Which means that this is already an existential-constitutional crisis. The question is how much power the security forces are capable (or willing) to bring to bear in order to protect the state. The Assembly of Experts (the group with the power to unseat K.) has issued a strong message of support for him.
 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
If this is true, then the protesters can only succeed by effecting a drastic curtailment of his power, if not his replacement. Which means that this is already an existential-constitutional crisis.

I think these are both true. I dunno about "drastic" - certainly they have to reduce his power to the point where he can't just have them crushed as soon as they take the pressure off. so it's like a cycle of escalation - which the regime has now bought into, after initially trying to stay out of it.

re: the security forces/army/police - while it's not the only question surely it's the primary one & it looms over everything else. have to partially disagree w/Vim - the protesters don't have to defeat the security forces but they do have to neutralize them/their power, somehow. agree that they have to keep protesting, keep moving, w/"stasis is death". or stasis = the regime prevailing (in the short run at least) = death.

what the hell is the Artesh up to?

USMC Military Culture Guide on the Artesh, IRGC & Basij

The Artesh regards the IRGC and particularly the Basij as untrained and low class and the IRGC sees the Artesh as elitist, hierarchical, and un-Islamic. Since the end of the Iran-Iraq War, the Artesh and the IRGC have developed more compatible working relationships that allow for complex, multi-service joint-training exercises. The IRGC has developed some units whose emphasis on professionalism is acceptable to the Artesh, and the Artesh has proven its loyalty and value to the Islamic Republic through its service during the Iran-Iraq War. Still, conflicts and rivalries remain
 

vimothy

yurp
Yeah, but at present stasis isn't the regime prevailing. Stasis is flying stones and burning cars and tear gas.

BTW, CNN have been showing footage straight from YouTube -- dead protesters, beaten Basiji and all.
 
Last edited:

vimothy

yurp
Good question though.

Searching for info, I come across a post at uskowi on Iran, from April 09, with the following comment:

Feel-good pronouncements such as this cannot obscure the fact that Iran cannot move forward as a regional power until the state has full control over all the armed services. If the IRGC were only a special-operations directorate, that would be troubling enough. But their ambitions are much larger and a successful major power needs a strong, unified, fully professional military, not a bunch of cowboys looking for a rodeo.

Historically, every successful state has started with an inventive, energetic militia that eventually had to sublimated into a professional military. This process is incomplete in Iran and the persistence and success of the IRGC in siphoning funds and missions from the regular military is an indication of fundamental divisions and weaknesses in the central government.

Until the IRGC is dramatically reduced in size and the Regulars regain control over the reserves and the major combat elements, including missiles and aircraft, state consolidation in Iran will be more theoretical than real. There are Iranians who believe that the IRGC gives Iran indirect military and political options but, in truth, it only disperses state power and leaves the government vulnerable to arguments over tactics and strategy right at moments that they need to be focusing on their adversary. Iran needs to move beyond ad hoc revolutionary arrangements and become a cohesive state in order to achieve its goals and I believe the IRGC is standing in the way of that.

And this: http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/060728_gulf_iran.pdf
 
Last edited:

polystyle

Well-known member
Tehran hospitals ...

from FB.

Sofi Kar at 9:08pm June 20
Hospitals in Tehran are NOT safe. Basijis there, ppl disappearing. go to European embassies British (198 Ferdowsi Ave.), Portugese Embassy No.30, Nezami St., Abbas Pour St., Valy-e-Asr & Australian (No. 13, 23rd St.) embassies accepting Iranians injured in today's event Italian embassy French embassy plz everyone repeat this message every 10-15 minutes in ur facebooks, twitters,
 
Top