Clinamenic
Binary & Tweed
Fooled me. I thought @craner said those things.
Rolling Afghanistan Thread
- Thread starter padraig (u.s.)
- Start date
-
- Tags
- #squadgoals allahu ackbarz barry chateau battle rhymes bit of a pickle come mr taliban tally me banana designer fundamentalism do not face allah alone when astral projecting every possible contingency is biden's fault follow the white high-tops islamic magic jihaute just do it lord miles moon demon popping down to afghanistan roadman mask servis cheetahs that spring we lived on bowls of risotto the hexing of an oppressive regime the taliban's secretive one-eyed spiritual leader the whitest most out of touch witchcraft tl;dr
luka
Well-known member
double fooled! actually he did!
Clinamenic
Binary & Tweed
!
sufi
lala
more on that dodgy source:
I'd probably be annoyed if I were in Craner's position tbh.
Atlantic Council, Atlantic Bridge, The Atlantic. Beware anything with that term in the name.
luka
Well-known member
stop stirring. we are all wise to your game Edward!
luka
Well-known member
anglo-american deep state
Clinamenic
Binary & Tweed
Acrantic
IdleRich
IdleRich
I totally believed it. Didn't even think to question it.
I feel bad now, gonna have to email everyone that I messaged and tell them that it wasn't you after all. Fuck, how do I get this genie back into the bottle?
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
Who needs Atlanticism when the aim is to fight (and win) a land war in Asia. Eh, @148 I.Q. Magical Thinker ?
craner
Beast of Burden
I love your light and elegant style of sarcasm.
IdleRich
IdleRich
Er, that's not what sarcasm is is it? In what sense is that sarcasm? It was intended to be a silly way of saying that, broadly at least, I agree with you, Luka probably should not do that sort of thing*, but extrapolating from your sarcasm (I am applying the word correctly here) I think that you sensed an attack on your writing style (or something else?) - either way you will have to explain to me how it was sarcastic.
*Yes maybe this one is ridiculous enough that it won't cause any damage (hence , but if there are people who don't know you it potentially could represent you unfairly.
*Yes maybe this one is ridiculous enough that it won't cause any damage (hence , but if there are people who don't know you it potentially could represent you unfairly.
IdleRich
IdleRich
Ah ok. I get it. No I do think it is kinda not right... but with this particular example, cos it's light-hearted and silly it is difficult to say that without sounding unnecessarily uptight (which I sought to avoid by criticising it jokingly and, apparently, too obliquely) - which I now realise is something you were also aware of and sensitive to hence your response. No worries.
But necessary.
