There's a full deconstruction of the statement that that call for investigation was made in here: http://notris.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/corbyn-is-talking-shite-on-syria-again.html
27 April apparently. So three weeks after. I dobut very much he considered the evidence, just strikes the same pose he always does. The striking thing for me is that he doesn't mention Russian obstruction to condeming the gassing through the UN or blocking the investigation.
And makes sense? Oh come on dude. What about the conflict makes sense? It's a charnel house.
"Assad or the country burns". Does that "make sense"?
It does actually, because these forces don't seem to be as cohesive and confident as they project. The confidence comes from Russian and Iranian support, but government militias are taking on a life of their own, and threatening the authority of the Assad clan. By some accounts.
He didn't dump her to go to Syria did he? Seems a bit of an extreme way to get out of a relationship.
Hmmm.. Ok, so you have nothing but contempt for the idea that 'i dont know whats going on its extremely complex' but youre happy to embrace the idea that 'nothing makes sense, its chaos'?
Arguing about a country you know nothing about never been to never will no fucking clue sausages
Yes, he's passionate. Who'd have thought it in discussion of a war crime?
I don't have contempt for the acknowledgement of complexity but as I said above it's clearly used as "supressive fire" by the forces invovled. "It's complex" can be a simple truth, but can also be a hedge against trying to understand and against doing anything. I do have contempt for the cloud of unknowing it when it's applied to specific events that are warcrimes.