no, it means you are a crude and sloppy reader
Ha no. Look I find your position funny, but it's so 2006 urban75.
no, it means you are a crude and sloppy reader
That is a cop out and you know it Oliver. These are people who were fed the same inputs as yerself.
you dont understand my position becasue as Oliver points out your thought is locked up in abstract categories that dont map onto the real world in a reliable fashionHa no. Look I find your position funny, but it's so 2006 urban75.
And had different reactions, because human nature is not completely determined by economic categories. Escape the Marxist maze Thirdform, it's more interesting out here!
you dont understand my position becasue as Oliver points out your thought is locked up in abstract categories that dont map onto the real world in a reliable fashion
No silly boy. I'm saying why are your consciousness raising endeavours not working. Why are goody suave sophisticates analogous to yourself succumbing to these nauseating theories? This is the weakness in the anti-conspiracy argument, and I am about as anti-conspiracy as you can get. But those opposing conspiracy theories are doing it all the wrong way, from a perspective of scepticism, which is wrong.
any time, any place!When are you good for a bum shag, Luke? Let's diarise!
So how would you go about opposing it then?
By demystifying scepticism. Scepticism on its own is antiscientific. As a tool its fine, approaching everything with doubt is not. Flat earthers and denial gravity immediately springs to mind.
@luka too much of our control science is inexact, immature, unintegrated for the world to be properly run by humans.The world isn't run though. It's a frankensteins monster. To say the world is run by pedo satanists is a romantic illusion, it shows you are a tender existential lover at heart, not someone who has opened their third eye.
So kill the sceptics first and then move onto the conspiracists after. Who's left at the end?
yes yes, its all too complicated to understand. this is the default position, naturally.Once consciousness can be accounted for in binary code, then we can start running our own realities according to design. Until then, there will be too much potential for interference and unforeseen complexity.
@luka too much of our control science is inexact, immature, unintegrated for the world to be properly run by humans.
but the point is that it is not quite run properly, however, it runs. goods are manufactured and distributed. fortunes are accumulated. power is won and maintained. threats are identified and ANNHILATED!@luka too much of our control science is inexact, immature, unintegrated for the world to be properly run by humans.