vimothy

yurp
don't worry rich, stick your oar in, I don't mind.


biden has a big team of neocons on his bench, including ofc victoria "fuck the EU" nuland, he knows whats he's doing
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
don't worry rich, stick your oar in, I don't mind.


biden has a big team of neocons on his bench, including ofc victoria "fuck the EU" nuland, he knows whats he's doing
For what it's worth I'm not sure Trump would have responded so robustly to Russia but we don't know that and you should at least acknowledge you're not comparing like with like.
 

DannyL

Wild Horses
wrt war with nato, russia is doing pretty well. i.e., it hasn't been defeated. it's still a live concern. was the invasion a good idea? no, obviously not.
With respect dude, this is rubbish. "Not being defeated" is the lowest of bars. They've lost what? 200,000 men, God knows how many injured, the military is utterly weakened and exposed, Putin has had to go cap in hand to Xi, its going to have huge knock on effects on their arms trade etc etc. Just because there's not been total collapse - yet - doesn't mean they aren't losing pretty badly. Which is not the same as saying Ukraine is poised to take all their territory back.
 

DannyL

Wild Horses
but that goes both ways. are we benefiting? is this as success of western strategy? no, it's not that either.
Challenging a rouge state like Russia strengthens the West IMO. I would say strategically it seems like a success so far, in that it's not got too hot. I don't know what the long term effects will be but you could certainly argue liberal democracy will come out looking a lot stronger.
 

DannyL

Wild Horses
For what it's worth I'm not sure Trump would have responded so robustly to Russia but we don't know that and you should at least acknowledge you're not comparing like with like.
This is one of the reasons that I think a lot rides on the Spring offensive. Zelensky et al know they have to demonstrate some strategic gains to stop the attrition of the war effort which would obvs get a lot worse under a Trump/Republican presidency.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
both sides are substantially weaker. within russia, putin is probably stronger. which is fine.
I don't really see how NATO is "weaker", given that it's just acquired or is about to acquire two new members, and all existing members have pledged to increase their defence spending: https://commonslibrary.parliament.u...by-nato-members-since-russia-invaded-ukraine/

If you're right about Russia, i.e. that it's weaker overall but Putin has a stronger grip on it, I'm not sure that sounds like a good thing either for Russia or the rest of the world. It just makes it sound like he's more likely to do something desperate to continue clinging to power, and there will be fewer people in any position to try and talk him out of it.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
For what it's worth I'm not sure Trump would have responded so robustly to Russia but we don't know that and you should at least acknowledge you're not comparing like with like.
Trump, if anything, would be more inclined to sent military aid to Russia, if he could possibly get away with it.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
With respect dude, this is rubbish. "Not being defeated" is the lowest of bars. They've lost what? 200,000 men, God knows how many injured, the military is utterly weakened and exposed, Putin has had to go cap in hand to Xi, its going to have huge knock on effects on their arms trade etc etc. Just because there's not been total collapse - yet - doesn't mean they aren't losing pretty badly. Which is not the same as saying Ukraine is poised to take all their territory back.
Yeah, it's hard to square "doing pretty well" with being in receipt of aid from DPRK: https://www.csis.org/analysis/north-korea-sends-ammunitions-russia
 

wild greens

Well-known member
If they really did destroy a bunker in UKR with hundreds of NATO staff inside recently, that would be a win. Anyone heard anything about that?

I did read about this last month but it seems to be disinformation, unless you mean a different NATO bunker


Not to say Snopes are perfect after the whole david mikkelson thing, but it does seem like a bit of a reach
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps

Leo

Well-known member

He just said out loud what thousands of website do every day. Those sites don't have hundreds of reporters covering different beats; they probably have a few people who just take news that breaks on AP, Reuters, Washington Post, NY Times, etc., slightly reword it, and post it on their own site. If they're generous, they'll include a link to the original source, or at some point say "the news first appeared on AP" or something.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
He just said out loud what thousands of website do every day. Those sites don't have hundreds of reporters covering different beats; they probably have a few people who just take news that breaks on AP, Reuters, Washington Post, NY Times, etc., slightly reword it, and post it on their own site. If they're generous, they'll include a link to the original source, or at some point say "the news first appeared on AP" or something.
Sure, but you can imagine this looks worse for a fact-checking website that often presents its articles as being original research, though, right? And it sounds like they could have avoided this just by adding a little "According to a report in the NYT..." here and there.
 
Top