And you just know that, a generation ago, these same guys would have considered knocking the hats off elderly Orthodox men and carving swastikas into park benches a Saturday well spent. Their 'support' for Israel begins and ends with it being a way to antagonise Muslims and lefties.Yes. I was at the march today and passed a bar with a load of EDL brothers chanting Israel at small group of protestors, it’s the same thing. Reminded me of passing loyalist bars in Belfast, it’s actually just a bit of craic for these men first and foremost, they get a buzz from provoking
sure like I said everything exists within some greater context. what I think is incorrect is the flattening of any situation but particularly Isr-Pal to fit into into a narrow geopolitical context.true, but it's also a question of lenses or analytical dimensions. you can look at the conflict in terms of domestic Israeli-Palestinian politics, you can look at the conflict in terms of its effect on regional geopolitics in the middle east, and you can look at it in terms of the global-historical context. no perspective is complete on it's own exactly, but equally no perspective is redundant.
where droid and I probably differ is how thoroughly sick a society we think Israel has becomeThere's no coming back from this. Not for Israel and not for those who celebrated and defended these atrocities. Genocide leaves a permanent stain.
Without an agreement imposed from the outside, our situation will deteriorate to that of a second Vietnam, to a war in constant escalation without the prospect of ultimate resolution.
“Security” is a reality only where there is true peace between neighbors, as in the case of Holland/Belgium, Sweden/Norway, the United States/Canada. In the absence of peace there is no security, and no geographic-strategic settlement on the land can change this. There is no direct link between security and the territories.
Our security has been diminished rather than enhanced as a result of the conquests in this war.
Rule over the occupied territories would have social repercussions. After a few years there would be no Jewish workers or Jewish farmers. The Arabs would be the working people and the Jews the administrators, inspectors, officials, and police—mainly secret police. A state ruling a hostile population of 1.5 to 2 million foreigners would necessarily become a secret-police state, with all that this implies for education, free speech, and democratic institutions. The corruption characteristic of every colonial regime would also prevail in the state of Israel. The administration would have to suppress Arab insurgency on the one hand and acquire Arab Quislings on the other. There is also good reason to fear that the Israel Defense Force, which has been until now a people’s army, would, as a result of being transformed into an army of occupation, degenerate, and its commanders, who will have become military governors, resemble their colleagues in other nations.Out of concern for the Jewish people and its state we have no choice but to withdraw from the territories and their population of one and a half million Arabs.
As for the “religious” arguments for the annexation of the territories—these are only an expression, subconsciously or perhaps even overtly hypocritical, of the transformation of the Jewish religion into a camouflage for Israeli nationalism. Counterfeit religion identifies national interests with the service of God and imputes to the state—which is only an instrument serving human needs—supreme value from a religious standpoint.
where droid and I probably differ is how thoroughly sick a society we think Israel has become
there is still the Israel of B'Tselem, Haaretz, +972, Breaking the Silence, Yesh Din, etc, an Israel with the ability to be self-critical and the courage to pursue peaceful coexistence. there are still some kind of brakes on the madness. Amichai Eliyahu was fired (he's the guy who was fired for talking about nuking Gaza) and Distal-Atbaryan - who is an absolute lunatic btw - was forced to resign.
my hope I guess is that Oct 7 wakes Israelis up not only how ruinous Netanyahu was personally, but his policies as well. maybe I have to believe that for personal reasons, idk, but there is a precedent - after their resounding victory in 67 the Israelis developed a belief, the conceptzia, that they were basically invincible and could treat the Arab govts with contempt. that was shattered in 73, leading to the downfall of Labor and eventually, peace with Egypt. Oct 7 shattered the illusion of indefinite occupation with minimal cost. I can only hope something better emerges the wake of the disillusionment.
Some of it does, i.e. Sharon was Gush Emunim's most important patron.A lot of what she says dovetails with official policy though, long before Netanyahu.