Simon Reynolds describes wobble as the properly hardcore component of dubstep - something Andy alluded to upthread, I think - which is fair enough: it's got the who gives-a-shit attitude to good taste, the dancefloor-centricness, the OTT caner thing. Although it doesn't have the haphazardly yoked together combination of elements and factions that made ardkore 92 so fertile - so it's more like happy hardcore or gabber or clownstep or whatever. Only much more mainstream at the moment.
Reynolds slammed and then disowned drum & bass for going down the wobble route then holds up wobble in dubstep as 'ludic' or 'hardcore'... they're exactly the same sonics used within 35 bpm of each other, so which is it?
TBH I'd say that using 'hardcore' as an inherently positive thing is a mistake. It's about a fanatical and generally unselfconscious dedication to a small area of endeavour (bitcrushing wobbles, writing super cheesey piano riffs, making models of salisbury cathedral out of matchsticks) which as an outsider you have to take on a case-by-case basis as totally brilliant, alright for the odd tune, not really my thing, entirely awful, whatever, and you have to take the view that there are more factors than "is it hardcore or not" in how something evolves.Reynolds slammed and then disowned drum & bass for going down the wobble route then holds up wobble in dubstep as 'ludic' or 'hardcore'... they're exactly the same sonics used within 35 bpm of each other, so which is it?
has only one idea per track and hasn't very much influences from outside.