Trump
- Thread starter Leo
- Start date
-
- Tags
- #mentoo baggy bumhole due to heroin craner had sex with a girl craner saw a girl naked crooked luka everyone has dickpicks of everyone grab them by the sufi hashtag jurisdiction hashtag witchhunts mr tea don't miss now impeach johnson ffs obsessive male feminists office romance or sexual harassment? parp patriots in control pfft! poot! release the leo tapes! so much winning some of my best friends are internet racists squirt starmer deathwatch tea fancies donald that's a lovely dress the j stands for genius trump le monde version made all these tags what about the snowflakes whispers of manifestation on borlest white men fight back
IdleRich
IdleRich
One thing that strikes me hearing the lawyers speak afterwards...
In boxing at the press conference the competitors tend to say something that amounts to "I'm gonna beat the shite of this guy and send him crying home to his mum". Both will say that, even the 100-1 outsider underdog, which makes it something of a meaningless statement. However a lot of sports - certainly the ones I watch - seem to have moved beyond that kind of crude bragging to something more along the lines of "We have a lot of respect for San Marino, there are no easy games in international football and even though this team is drawn from a pool of people the size of one of our small villages and made up of part-timers and journeymen from the Italian third division we are aware that they pose a threat going forwards and we will be certain not to underestimate them. Ultimately though I hope over ninety minutes we will prove the stronger".
But one sport that remains very much in the former camp is that of criminal law, the attorney's statement is always to the effect that their client is more innocent than anyone has ever been before, that it's frankly mind-boggling that such a ludicrous case has been brought on such flimsy evidence, and they are more than one thousand percent confident that they will demonstrate this so powerfully and unequivocally that the prosecutor will hang his head in shame, retire from the business altogether - and quite likely be found to in fact himself be the guilty party who committed the crime in question.
In boxing at the press conference the competitors tend to say something that amounts to "I'm gonna beat the shite of this guy and send him crying home to his mum". Both will say that, even the 100-1 outsider underdog, which makes it something of a meaningless statement. However a lot of sports - certainly the ones I watch - seem to have moved beyond that kind of crude bragging to something more along the lines of "We have a lot of respect for San Marino, there are no easy games in international football and even though this team is drawn from a pool of people the size of one of our small villages and made up of part-timers and journeymen from the Italian third division we are aware that they pose a threat going forwards and we will be certain not to underestimate them. Ultimately though I hope over ninety minutes we will prove the stronger".
But one sport that remains very much in the former camp is that of criminal law, the attorney's statement is always to the effect that their client is more innocent than anyone has ever been before, that it's frankly mind-boggling that such a ludicrous case has been brought on such flimsy evidence, and they are more than one thousand percent confident that they will demonstrate this so powerfully and unequivocally that the prosecutor will hang his head in shame, retire from the business altogether - and quite likely be found to in fact himself be the guilty party who committed the crime in question.
IdleRich
IdleRich
I think there is no doubt whatsoever of his guilt but it does seem they stretched the definition of a felony to breaking point - so what happens in that instance? They are guilty of a misdemeanor but accused of a felony?
Leo
Well-known member
just a gut feeling. they have plenty of evidence here that hush money payments were made, but there may be a little too much wiggle room with proving falsified business records to a jury. and the leap to connecting the payments to a federal campaign finance violation is an untested charge.
IdleRich
IdleRich
Think that was that scummy little prick Don Jr wasn't it?
IdleRich
IdleRich
What Magnus Carlsen, is he balding? Funny if he is, classic example of the lord giving and also taking away; an almost preternatural chess talent making him the greatest player that ever lived, and yet he's already losing his hair at age 17.
luka
Well-known member
i actually cant remember who i was referring to here
luka
Well-known member
it is undeniably a great picture. has a hollywood quality.
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
I assume Andrew Tate, who's apparently been released from prison in Romania.
Murphy
cat malogen
IdleRich
IdleRich
Oh right, describing him as 'balding' is quite generous. Also, I dunno if he is a sex trafficker who got let-off or a bit of a tosser who just spent months in jail for joking on the internet. I mean, I dunno if he's Teflon or the opposite.
IdleRich
IdleRich
I'm reading that cos of the time scale the judge has put on the next steps, it means the trial won't take place until 2024. I know the mills of god/justice grind slow, but that seems crazy. For starters surely it would make sense to get it out of the way before the primaries, and when will they squeeze the other things in - or he could easily die of old age by then and evade justice.
Leo
Well-known member
I heard for a trial of this nature, with 34 counts, that it's typical to start the trial about eight months after the indictment is made. Not saying it's not excessive, but it is typical. The weirdest thing is this could happen in the other three investigations as well, Trump will spend the next two years pingponging between NY, Washington and Atlanta for all his various trials.