"Accept" what? For the Nth time, Ukraine isn't in NATO, nor was NATO membership even remotely in the pipeline. It has no NATO bases, and wasn't about to acquire any. This is a completely idiotic argument. It's like shooting dead a random, unarmed person in the street "just in case" they were on their way to get a gun to threaten you with.again, its directly analogous. the us would not countenance this, why expect russia to accept it with no quarrels?
It's absurd to suppose that a nuclear conflict will come as a result of Putin pressing a big red button in a fit of tyrannical rage, it will most likely be the end result of a series of escalations that spiral out of control, like in pretty much every conflict that ever happened. An errant missile hitting Warsaw, a major terrorist attack in Moscow, a fighter jet collision over the Baltic sea. There are a disturbing number of plausible scenarios that could lead to a launch. The BBC wargamed this exact process in 2016.
About the size of it."Ukraine had a short skirt on, your honor"
"Accept" what? For the Nth time, Ukraine isn't in NATO, nor was NATO membership even remotely in the pipeline. It has no NATO bases, and wasn't about to acquire any. This is a completely idiotic argument. It's like shooting dead a random, unarmed person in the street "just in case" they were on their way to get a gun to threaten you with.
but they're clearly quite closely connected. and it's also clear from russian statements that this is a pressing matter for themUkraine expressing a wish to join NATO is a very, very far cry from Ukraine actually joining NATO. And their membership of the EU had already been kiboshed by France and Germany.
So what do you make of the unambiguously imperialistic rhetoric, references to Ukraine as 'little Russia', invocation of Peter the Great, and so on?but they're clearly quite closely connected. and it's also clear from russian statements that this is a pressing matter for them
Vim, try reading a bit about longstanding Russian attitudes towards Ukraine, its reality as country, its right to exist and so on. The invasion is a deeply imperialist project resting on exactly the attitudes you'd expect that support this.So what do you make of the unambiguously imperialistic rhetoric, references to Ukraine as 'little Russia', invocation of Peter the Great, and so on?
I mean, how explicit do they have to make it before you're prepared to recognise that imperialism for its own sake is playing a pretty big part here?