A thing about who is and who isn't "a fascist", etc
Something I remember talking with Nina about a long while back was the whole transitivity-of-contagion thing that was going on around the #boycottnovara blowup with the term "rape apologist", which was being applied liberally not only to people like George Galloway who directly said gross things that minimised rape and sexual violence, but also to anyone who (as Aaron Bastani did) then appeared on a public platform with Galloway, and so by extension to anybody involved with anything Bastani was involved with, and so on. This struck me as dangerous: people who had neither committed sexual violence, nor said anything themselves that minimised the seriousness of sexual violence, were effectively being attacked for being rape apologist apologist apologists. (I did think that Bastani shouldn't have appeared with Galloway, for that and a number of other reasons, but I thought that was an error of judgement and should have been criticised as such).
The immediate trigger for #boycottnovara was, as I recall, Novara publishing a piece by Jacob Bard-Rosenberg, who had been part of a group which some years previously had made a very presumptuous and poorly-judged intervention with respect to a sexual assault and the ensuing attempt to hold the perpetrator to account. The piece Novara had published had had nothing to do with these matters, and JBR was not himself accused of assaulting anyone, but the level of unresolved ill-feeling and trauma within those circles was such that merely to accredit his existence in public in this way was enough to re-ignite the whole thing. The resulting situation was extraordinarily ugly and stupid, and everyone who played a part in escalating it ought in my view to be ashamed of themselves.
So to fascism, and to fascist-sympathisers, and fascist-sympathiser-sympathisers, and so on. My honest opinion of Miller is that he's a self-promoting clown who's latched onto the controversialism of certain art-world dickheads with respect to the alt-right - Deanna Havas and so on - for largely opportunistic reasons. How far up his own arse he's really gone with all the esoteric Evola-inspired codshit he comes out with I can't really say. He's not the sort of person of whom it's generally meaningful to ask whether they're sincere or not. The only principle he consistently holds, it seems to me, is that he, Daniel "only God can judge me" Miller, is transcendentally innocent of all wrongdoing by definition, and anyone who has a problem with his behaviour is just some "nobody" who's projecting their ressentiment onto him. Maverick types like him are not uncommon in fascist circles, but they're mainly in it for the narcissistic supply. He'll move on in due course, and it will all have been a magnificent prank or whatever.
As for Nina, I'm reasonably sure she's not "a fascist", or really a "fascist sympathiser" in any meaningful sense, but rather someone who's behaving very stupidly and irresponsibly around someone who's behaving very stupidly and irresponsibly. Some of the things she's come out with are well dodgy, or sound well dodgy in the context of their being said around dodgy characters like Miller in front of an audience peppered with a sizeable contingent of alt-right trolls, but there's no solid evidence that she's committed to anything really resembling a fascist political programme. Maybe that's where she'll end up, but I find it hard to imagine. So, I think she's chosen to shit on certain basic principles that her former friends hold to be extremely important (like "don't publicly defend malignant imbeciles who put it about that all antifascists are delusional zealots acting out on their unacknowledged sadism and ressentiment" and "don't appear on public platforms with people whose art praxis includes exhibiting gross anti-semitic caricatures"), and I think there's a sort of fundamental bad faith involved in making that choice and then being outraged when people are angry with you for it, and start whispering about you, then yelling at you, then organising to stop you. But I think Stelfox has it basically right: this is all about trying to get out of an untenable position.