it is. it really, really is. and it's a situation where being proven right only makes you feel vastly worse.
and definitely. the difference is that climate change has unfolded over years/decades and this has unfolded over weeks/months.
so even tho climate change is the far greater existential threat to humanity, the timelapse between how seriously people should be taking the pandemic and how seriously they are taking it has been much shorter
Even though climate change is a more complex problem/situation, the timespan is longer, the mechanics of it is probably better known (by now), and there is a growing consensus of what should be done. Not saying there should be, the dissent voices in that debate are still welcome from my point of view.
This is more of an "unknown unknown". Although the type of virus (Corona) is well known, this variant seems to be a difficult one to crack for the scientists.
Regarding response it is obvious liberal western countries hasn't any recent experience with this, in fact the primary reason that we ARE liberal are probably because of low prevalence of infectious disease (since WW2), aka the "Parasite Stress Theory": Asian (and African) countries are quick to shut down, quarantine, use extensive surveillance, not because they're more authoritarian, but they are more authoritarian because of historically higher infectious disease/pathogens in the environment.
If because of interconnectedness this becomes a new normal in the future there in the Western Hemisphere (and there already been 2-3 scares in this century: SARS, MERS, swine flu), we could easily see this foster a change in peoples moral behaviour. Just imagine if Covid19 could be tracked to immigrants and not the global elite vacationing in the Alps.